SportsGambler: football prediction record
SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 4 of 107
Page 4 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 41–60 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 4 of 107
Showing 41–60 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
5 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “The betting sites might have been too generous with their odds of 1.65 when it comes to the BTTS Yes selection. We can’t see any reason why Le Mans and Lorient won’t find the net.”
25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Olympique de Marseille v Paris Saint-Germain Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 1.5: Olympique de Marseille +1.5 at 1.85 · final score 1-2
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Let’s take a chance on Marseille who are in receipt of a +1.5 goal start against PSG. The Asian Handicap odds of 1.85 are appealing
- Author said
- Asian handicap 1.5: Olympique de Marseille +1.5 at 1.85
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Olympique de Marseille 1-2 Paris Saint-Germain.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Olympique de Marseille — Paris Saint-Germain, , final score 1-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.85 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Toulouse v Le Havre Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.75: Le Havre +0.75 at 1.81 · final score 3-2
19 September 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Wager Le Havre +0.75 at 1.81 in their meeting with Toulouse. Dividing the Asian Handicap stake between +0.5 and +1.0 means we have the safety net if the visitors lose by a goal, with a full payout for a draw or win.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.75: Le Havre +0.75 at 1.81
- Outcome of the pick
- Half lost: the final score was Toulouse 3-2 Le Havre.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Toulouse — Le Havre, , final score 3-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.81 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Our stake will be split when taking Troyes +0.25 at odds of 1.94 for this Asian Handicap bet. It means a return in the event of a draw but a bigger payout should the visitors claim a win against…”
25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Monaco v RC Lens Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Monaco at 2.06 · final score 2-1
18 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Monaco look like a spot of value at 2.06 when it comes to the Full-Time Result market. The home team should be able to deliver a victory against Lens based on the information available.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Monaco at 2.06
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Monaco 2-1 RC Lens.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Monaco — RC Lens, , final score 2-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 2.06 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Let’s take a chance on Marseille who are in receipt of a +1.5 goal start against PSG. The Asian Handicap odds of 1.85 are appealing considering that we’ll win the bet if OM win, draw or lose by a…”
25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Paris FC v RC Strasbourg Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.66 · final score 2-1
19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We are backing Over 2.5 in the Total Goals market at 1.66, with Paris FC and Strasbourg set to play out a high-scoring contest. We think the odds are attractive when it comes to at least three goals being scored.
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.66
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Paris FC 2-1 RC Strasbourg.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Paris FC — RC Strasbourg, , final score 2-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.66 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Stade Brestois v Paris Saint-Germain Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 1.75: Stade Brestois +1.75 at 1.83 · final score 0-1
13 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Brest can push PSG close and we’re happy to side with the underdogs at +1.75. Our Asian Handicap stake is split between +1.5 and +2.0 at odds of 1.83 and we anticipate a nice return.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 1.75: Stade Brestois +1.75 at 1.83
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Stade Brestois 0-1 Paris Saint-Germain.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Stade Brestois — Paris Saint-Germain, , final score 0-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Inter Miami CF v San Diego FC Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 1.25: San Diego FC +1.25 at 1.93 · final score 2-2
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We can expect to see a strong showing from San Diego +1.25 on the Asian Handicap. Claim a price of 1.93, with this pick seeing bettors divide their money between +1 and +1.5 for the encounter against Inter Miami.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 1.25: San Diego FC +1.25 at 1.93
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Inter Miami CF 2-2 San Diego FC.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Inter Miami CF — San Diego FC, , final score 2-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.93 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Colorado Rapids v Seattle Sounders FC Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Colorado Rapids at 1.93 · final score 3-3
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Colorado Rapids have the capability of securing a victory when they clash with Seattle Sounders. For this reason, we are going to take the Full-Time Result odds of 1.93 with a large degree of confidence.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Colorado Rapids at 1.93
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Colorado Rapids 3-3 Seattle Sounders FC.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Colorado Rapids — Seattle Sounders FC, , final score 3-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.93 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Houston Dynamo v FC Cincinnati Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Houston Dynamo at 1.92 · final score 2-2
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Houston Dynamo could land the money against FC Cincinnati and we’ll take this pick on the Full-Time Result market. There are appealing odds of 1.92 and we can’t pass up the chance to back the favourites.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Houston Dynamo at 1.92
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Houston Dynamo 2-2 FC Cincinnati.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Houston Dynamo — FC Cincinnati, , final score 2-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.92 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Seattle Sounders FC v Real Salt Lake Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Seattle Sounders FC at 1.82 · final score 2-0
24 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
There’s a strong chance that we’ll see Seattle Sounders record a victory and the Rave Green are priced at 1.82 to beat Real Salt Lake. We think that the Full-Time Result market offers bettors plenty of value.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Seattle Sounders FC at 1.82
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Seattle Sounders FC 2-0 Real Salt Lake.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Seattle Sounders FC — Real Salt Lake, , final score 2-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.82 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Nashville SC v Chicago Fire Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Nashville SC at 1.83 · final score 3-0
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Our opinion is that Nashville SC will prove too strong in all departments and we’ll therefore take the 1.83 that they beat Chicago Fire. This Full-Time Result bet looks like a value proposition.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Nashville SC at 1.83
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Nashville SC 3-0 Chicago Fire.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Nashville SC — Chicago Fire, , final score 3-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Portland Timbers v Atlanta United Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Portland Timbers at 2.15 · final score 0-1
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Portland Timbers look a great bet to beat Atlanta United on the Full-Time Result market. You can get odds of 2.15 with Stake that the home team claim a victory and this looks like a value wager based on the latest stats and team news.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Portland Timbers at 2.15
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Portland Timbers 0-1 Atlanta United.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Portland Timbers — Atlanta United, , final score 0-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 2.15 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Real Salt Lake v Vancouver Whitecaps Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Vancouver Whitecaps at 1.91 · final score 0-3
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We can’t resist the chance to back Vancouver Whitecaps on the basis that they are 1.91 to land a win against Real Salt Lake. We’ll back this Full-Time Result wager with optimism based on the available information.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Vancouver Whitecaps at 1.91
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Real Salt Lake 0-3 Vancouver Whitecaps.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Real Salt Lake — Vancouver Whitecaps, , final score 0-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.91 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- Minnesota United v LA Galaxy Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Minnesota United at 1.65 · final score 2-3
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
There’s a strong case for siding with Minnesota United when it comes to the Full-Time Result betting market. We think the favourites could prove too strong for LA Galaxy and odds of 1.65 are attractive.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Minnesota United at 1.65
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Minnesota United 2-3 LA Galaxy.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Minnesota United — LA Galaxy, , final score 2-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.65 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- St.Louis City v Toronto FC Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: St.Louis City at 1.68 · final score 3-1
20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Our opinion is that St. Louis City will prove too strong in all departments and we’ll therefore take the 1.68 that they beat Toronto FC. This Full-Time Result bet looks like a value proposition.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: St.Louis City at 1.68
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was St.Louis City 3-1 Toronto FC.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- St.Louis City — Toronto FC, , final score 3-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.68 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “If you concur with our view that Philadelphia Union will have the upper hand when meeting Sporting KC, then you can wager the away team at 1.61. We’re anticipating a return with this Full-Time…”
25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- VfB Stuttgart v Viking FK Excluded
Said: Asian handicap −2: VfB Stuttgart −2 at 1.89 · final score 3-1
9 September 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
If you agree that Stuttgart can land a sizeable win, then you can get them at -2 on the Asian Handicap at 1.89.
- Author said
- Asian handicap −2: VfB Stuttgart −2 at 1.89
- Outcome of the pick
- Void: the final score was VfB Stuttgart 3-1 Viking FK.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Correction
- Corrected on
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- VfB Stuttgart — Viking FK, , final score 3-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.89 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log
Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “We’re heading to the Total Goals market and backing the Over 2.5 selection at a price of 1.80.”
25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
Other recorded statements (15)
Repeated picks and copies on other platforms. They leave the counts unchanged; each one with its prices is in this page's JSON.
“At least one of Nottingham Forest and Coventry might come up short on the goal front, with the BTTS No betting selection looking like the standout bet. That’s particularly when you can get odds of…”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
1. FC Union Berlin — SV 07 Elversberg: “Elversberg Asian Hcp +0.25 @ 1.84”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.
1. FSV Mainz 05 — Bayer 04 Leverkusen: “Back them at 1.87 with a +0.25 goal start”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
FC Augsburg — FC Bayern München: “Augsburg Asian Hcp +2.25 @ 1.90”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
Vitória — Chapecoense: “Our bet builder selections include Vitória to succeed, BTTS No and Marcinho (Chape) to record a minimum of one shot on target.”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
Internacional de Bogotá — Once Caldas: “Inter Asian Hcp +0.25 @ 1.60”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
Internacional de Bogotá — Once Caldas: “We’ve found an attractive bet at odds of 6.75 and it involves Inter Bogotá winning 1-0.”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off
New York Red Bulls — St.Louis City: “St. Louis To Win @ 1.96”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on : The match was postponed from to , and the official schedule listed the new date as a separate fixture. The pick is now linked to the rescheduled
New York Red Bulls — St.Louis City: “Emil Forsberg (Red Bulls) is available to finish with a minimum of one shot on goal at 1.85.”
sportsgambler.com · published · first recorded by us · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on : The match was postponed from to , and the official schedule listed the new date as a separate fixture. The pick is now linked to the rescheduled
Juventus — Atalanta: “We believe that Juventus will get the better of Atalanta and the La Vecchia Signora are excellent value at 1.67. The Full-Time Result odds look really attractive and we’re confident of landing a…”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Fiorentina — SSC Napoli: “Napoli appear to be an attractive wager when it comes to the Full-Time Result market. You can get odds of 2.15 that I Partenopei defeat Fiorentina and we’re feeling upbeat that this is a value bet.”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Venezia — Lazio: “We think that Lazio will have the upper hand against Venezia and we like the price of 2.00 on the Full-Time Result market. The odds make plenty of appeal and we’re expecting this bet to land.”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Udinese — Cagliari: “We think a value wager could involve betting Under 2.5 on the Total Goals market for the fixture between Udinese and Cagliari. We can secure a price of 1.65 when it comes to this bet.”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
Bologna — Torino: “Bologna look like the bet to place on the Full-Time Result market, especially as odds of 1.89 are available. Back our value selection with confidence when I Rossoblù clash with Torino.”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
AC Milan — Lecce: “Lecce are an attractive Asian Handicap bet at +1.75 when they go up against AC Milan. With our stake divided between +1.5 and +2.0, we think the visitors can produce a good performance at odds of…”
sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us