Forecast Record Tips today
Menu

SportsGambler: football prediction record

SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 5 of 107

Page 5 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 61–80 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 5 of 107

Showing 61–80 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

5 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.

  1. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Napoli should prove to be competitive against Arsenal. With this in mind, we’ll back the home team on the Asian Handicap +0.75 at odds of 1.83, meaning a split stake between 0.5 and +1.0.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  2. Liverpool v Atlético Madrid Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Liverpool at 1.75 · final score 2-1

    9 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’re confident in the chances of Liverpool when they clash with Atlético Madrid, with our selection appealing on the Full-Time Result market.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Liverpool at 1.75
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Liverpool 2-1 Atlético Madrid.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Liverpool — Atlético Madrid, , final score 2-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.75 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  3. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Sporting could land the money against Galatasaray and we’ll take this pick on the Full-Time Result market.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  4. SSC Napoli v Arsenal Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.75: SSC Napoli +0.75 at 1.83 · final score 0-1

    9 September 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    With this in mind, we’ll back the home team on the Asian Handicap +0.75 at odds of 1.83, meaning a split stake between 0.5 and +1.0.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.75: SSC Napoli +0.75 at 1.83
    Outcome of the pick
    Half lost: the final score was SSC Napoli 0-1 Arsenal.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SSC Napoli — Arsenal, , final score 0-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  5. PSV Eindhoven v Shakhtar Donetsk Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.64 · final score 1-1

    10 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · price disputed: the quote does not give the author's price 1.64; returns at the author's price leave it out · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    The latest stats and xG data suggest that the BTTS Yes outcome could deliver a return.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.64
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was PSV Eindhoven 1-1 Shakhtar Donetsk.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    PSV Eindhoven — Shakhtar Donetsk, , final score 1-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.64 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  6. FC Bayern München v Bodø/Glimt Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.66 · final score 5-0

    10 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    After careful consideration, we’re going to place a BTTS Yes bet on the basis that 1.66 looks like great value.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.66
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was FC Bayern München 5-0 Bodø/Glimt.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    FC Bayern München — Bodø/Glimt, , final score 5-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.66 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  7. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We really like Como at odds of 1.86 with Stake to beat RB Leipzig, with this Full-Time Result bet making lots of appeal.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  8. FC Barcelona v Feyenoord Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 2.75: Feyenoord +2.75 at 1.97 · final score 5-1

    9 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Feyenoord could be a shrewd wager with a 2.75 Asian Handicap, especially with a price of 1.97.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 2.75: Feyenoord +2.75 at 1.97
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was FC Barcelona 5-1 Feyenoord.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    FC Barcelona — Feyenoord, , final score 5-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.97 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  9. SK Slavia Praha v RC Lens Excluded

    Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.81 · final score 2-3

    10 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    It’s time to back Over 2.5 at 1.81 for the Total Goals, with Slavia Prague and Lens set to contest a high-scoring encounter.
    Author said
    Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.81
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was SK Slavia Praha 2-3 RC Lens.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SK Slavia Praha — RC Lens, , final score 2-3
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.81 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  10. Anderlecht v Olympique Lyonnais Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.5: Anderlecht +0.5 at 1.83 · final score 1-2

    16 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’ll take Anderlecht to get the better of Lyon on the Asian Handicap, with odds of 1.83 available that the home team win with a +0.5 goal start. If they avoid defeat, then we will get paid out with this wager.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.5: Anderlecht +0.5 at 1.83
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Anderlecht 1-2 Olympique Lyonnais.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Anderlecht — Olympique Lyonnais, , final score 1-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  11. Juventus v NEC Nijmegen Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap −1.75: Juventus −1.75 at 1.84 · final score 5-0

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Juventus should finish well clear of NEC Nijmegen and we’re playing the -1.75 on the Asian Handicap. It means our stake is split between -1.5 and -2.0 at tempting betting odds of 1.84.
    Author said
    Asian handicap −1.75: Juventus −1.75 at 1.84
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Juventus 5-0 NEC Nijmegen.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Juventus — NEC Nijmegen, , final score 5-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.84 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  12. Plzen v Union St. Gilloise Excluded

    Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.84 · final score 0-3

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’re heading to the Total Goals market and backing the Over 2.5 selection at a price of 1.84. There’s a strong prospect that Viktoria Plzeň and Union Saint-Gilloise will land a payout and we’re going into this bet with confidence.
    Author said
    Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.84
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Plzen 0-3 Union St. Gilloise.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Plzen — Union St. Gilloise, , final score 0-3
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.84 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  13. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We’ve going to back OFI Crete +1.25 when they line up against Hoffenheim. You can get Asian Handicap odds of 1.86 and our stake is split between +1 and +1.5 when it comes to the Black and White.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  14. Sturm Graz v Stade Rennais Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.5: Sturm Graz +0.5 at 1.86 · final score 0-0

    16 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Sturm Graz +0.5 could be the best bet to have and the latest stats back this up. Take the hosts at 1.86 on the Asian Handicap against Rennes, with this being a confident selection on the underdogs.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.5: Sturm Graz +0.5 at 1.86
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Sturm Graz 0-0 Stade Rennais.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Sturm Graz — Stade Rennais, , final score 0-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.86 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  15. Beşiktaş v Olympique de Marseille Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Beşiktaş at 1.76 · final score 4-1

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    If you agree with our verdict that Besiktas can defeat Marseille, then there’s the chance to get betting odds of 1.76 that this happens. We think that this price sticks out on the Full-Time Result market.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Beşiktaş at 1.76
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Beşiktaş 4-1 Olympique de Marseille.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Beşiktaş — Olympique de Marseille, , final score 4-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.76 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  16. Sunderland v AZ Alkmaar Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Sunderland at 1.66 · final score 1-0

    16 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We can back Sunderland at 1.66 to get the better of AZ Alkmaar and this looks like a standout price. The Full-Time Result market gives us the chance to grab a slice of value for this selection.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Sunderland at 1.66
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Sunderland 1-0 AZ Alkmaar.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Sunderland — AZ Alkmaar, , final score 1-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.66 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  17. Crystal Palace v Lech Poznań Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.84 · final score 4-0

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Goals could be scored by both Crystal Palace and Lech Poznan and that means heading to the Both Teams to Score market. We really like the 1.84 when it comes to the BTTS Yes selection.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.84
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Crystal Palace 4-0 Lech Poznań.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Crystal Palace — Lech Poznań, , final score 4-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.84 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  18. Levski Sofia v Red Bull Salzburg Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Levski Sofia +0.25 at 1.83 · final score 0-1

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’ll split our stake by backing Levski Sofia +0.25 at odds of 1.83 for this Asian Handicap wager. It means we have a return if they draw but a nice payout should the Blue Avalanche claim a victory against Red Bull Salzburg.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Levski Sofia +0.25 at 1.83
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Levski Sofia 0-1 Red Bull Salzburg.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Levski Sofia — Red Bull Salzburg, , final score 0-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  19. Real Sociedad v AFC Bournemouth Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.6 · final score 1-2

    17 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    There’s an attractive 1.60 available when it comes to Real Sociedad and Bournemouth both scoring at least one goal. We’re expecting a nice return from this BTTS Yes wager based on the available stats.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.6
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Real Sociedad 1-2 AFC Bournemouth.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Real Sociedad — AFC Bournemouth, , final score 1-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.60 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  20. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “The odds of 1.85 look too good to pass up when it comes to both England and Argentina scoring here. A nice potential return is on the cards by taking this BTTS Yes option and we think it has a…”

    25 September 2026 · national-team match (Nations League, qualifiers, continental cups) · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

Other recorded statements (12)

Repeated picks and copies on other platforms. They leave the counts unchanged; each one with its prices is in this page's JSON.

  1. Parma — Genoa: “When Parma meet Genoa, we will back the hosts at 1.72 on the Asian Handicap +0.25. With the stake split between 0 and +0.5, I Crociati look capable of landing a return by avoiding defeat.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

  2. Frosinone — Como: “If you agree that Frosinone +1 are a good bet on the Asian Handicap, then you can get 2.00 that they draw or beat Como. There’s money back if I Canarini are defeated by the narrowest of margins.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

  3. Fulham — Manchester United: “There’s a very real prospect that Manchester United can have the edge over Fulham and we’ll therefore select the Red Devils when it comes to Full-Time Result. The price of 1.97 looks impossible to…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  4. Manchester City — Sunderland: “We’re heading to the Total Goals market and backing the Over 2.5 selection at a price of 1.61. There’s a strong prospect that Manchester City and Sunderland will land a payout and we’re going into…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  5. Leeds United — Crystal Palace: “Leeds can’t be ignored when they meet Crystal Palace, especially as betting odds of 1.74 are available for this prediction. The Full-Time Result market offers strong value here, making the Whites…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  6. “At least one of Nottingham Forest and Coventry might come up short on the goal front, with the BTTS No betting selection looking like the standout bet. That’s particularly when you can get odds of…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  7. Newcastle United — Hull City: “The best betting angle for this Newcastle vs Hull fixture could be the BTTS Yes option, especially as it’s attractively priced at 1.66. We can see the two teams both finding the net.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  8. Everton — Ipswich Town: “There’s an attractive 1.65 available for Over 2.5 on the Total Goals market and that looks too good an opportunity to pass up. Bet on Everton and Ipswich to find the net at least three times…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  9. Tottenham Hotspur — Aston Villa: “We’ll take the plunge and back Tottenham to secure victory when they go up against Aston Villa. There’s plenty of confidence behind this Full-Time Result wager and the odds of 2.02 look attractive.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  10. AFC Bournemouth — Liverpool: “We’ll back Bournemouth +0.25 on the Asian Handicap and split our stake between 0 and +0.5 when the Cherries clash with Liverpool. A victory delivers a nice payout at 1.94 although a draw would…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  11. Brighton & Hove Albion — Arsenal: “Back Brighton +0.75 at 1.94 when they clash against Arsenal. Splitting Asian Handicap stakes between +0.5 and +1.0 means we get insurance if the home team lose by a goal, although a full return…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

  12. Brentford — Chelsea: “Brentford look capable of beating Chelsea and we’ll take them on the Asian Handicap. Back the home team at 1.77 with a +0.25 goal start, with our stake split between 0 and +0.5 which means a…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately.

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us