Forecast Record Tips today
Menu

SportsGambler: football prediction record

SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 3 of 107

Page 3 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 21–40 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 3 of 107

Showing 21–40 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

3 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.

  1. Getafe v Málaga CF Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Getafe at 2 · final score 1-0

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Getafe look like the bet to place on the Full-Time Result market, especially as odds of 2.00 are available.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Getafe at 2
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Getafe 1-0 Málaga CF.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Getafe — Málaga CF, , final score 1-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.00 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  2. Sevilla v FC Barcelona Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.68 · final score 1-3

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We like the odds of 1.68 when it comes to the BTTS Yes selection. Sevilla and Barcelona should be able to net at least once and the Both Teams to Score market provides a good angle.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.68
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Sevilla 1-3 FC Barcelona.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Sevilla — FC Barcelona, , final score 1-3
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.68 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  3. Monza v Sassuolo Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Monza +0.25 at 1.77 · final score 2-1

    18 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’ll back Monza +0.25 on the Asian Handicap and split our stake between 0 and +0.5 when I Biancorossi clash with Sassuolo. A victory delivers a nice payout at 1.77 although a draw would still mean a return.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Monza +0.25 at 1.77
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Monza 2-1 Sassuolo.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Monza — Sassuolo, , final score 2-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.77 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  4. AS Roma v Inter Excluded

    Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.61 · final score 2-2

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We think there’s a good angle when it comes to Over 2.5 for the clash between Roma and Inter Milan. Our opinion is that the Total Goals market affords great value and we will snap up the 1.61 on offer.
    Author said
    Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.61
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was AS Roma 2-2 Inter.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    AS Roma — Inter, , final score 2-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.61 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  5. Eintracht Frankfurt v SC Freiburg Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: SC Freiburg +0.25 at 1.8 · final score 2-2

    19 September 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We will split our stake on the Asian Handicap between 0 and +0.5 when wagering Freiburg +0.25 at 1.80 against Eintracht Frankfurt.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: SC Freiburg +0.25 at 1.8
    Outcome of the pick
    Half won: the final score was Eintracht Frankfurt 2-2 SC Freiburg.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Eintracht Frankfurt — SC Freiburg, , final score 2-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.80 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  6. FC Bayern München v 1. FC Union Berlin Excluded

    Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.75 · final score 7-0

    18 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    It’s likely that we’ll see both Bayern Munich and Union Berlin finding the net and that leads us to back BTTS Yes. This betting selection is priced at 1.75 and can be wagered with confidence.
    Author said
    Both teams to score: yes at 1.75
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was FC Bayern München 7-0 1. FC Union Berlin.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    FC Bayern München — 1. FC Union Berlin, , final score 7-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.75 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  7. FC Schalke 04 v SV 07 Elversberg Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: FC Schalke 04 at 1.96 · final score 0-0

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Schalke 04 are priced at 1.96 to secure a Full-Time Result victory and we think these odds are too big.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: FC Schalke 04 at 1.96
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was FC Schalke 04 0-0 SV 07 Elversberg.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    FC Schalke 04 — SV 07 Elversberg, , final score 0-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.96 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  8. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “The Asian Handicap route looks attractive considering you can get Elversberg +2.5 at odds of 1.87. We think the Black and White can keep the scoreline close against Bayern Munich and avoid a…”

    24 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  9. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Hamburger SV +0.25 on the Asian Handicap could be the way forward at 1.71. They should be able to avoid defeat against FC Koln, with our stake split between 0 and +0.5, meaning a victory is the…”

    24 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  10. VfB Stuttgart v Borussia Dortmund Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Borussia Dortmund +0.25 at 1.86 · final score 0-1

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    The best plan could involve backing Borussia Dortmund with a +0.25 Asian Handicap at 1.86 when clashing with Stuttgart.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Borussia Dortmund +0.25 at 1.86
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was VfB Stuttgart 0-1 Borussia Dortmund.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    VfB Stuttgart — Borussia Dortmund, , final score 0-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.86 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  11. SC Paderborn 07 v TSG Hoffenheim Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.75: SC Paderborn 07 +0.75 at 2 · final score 3-1

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Paderborn +0.75 at 2.00 look like the best bet against Hoffenheim.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.75: SC Paderborn 07 +0.75 at 2
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was SC Paderborn 07 3-1 TSG Hoffenheim.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SC Paderborn 07 — TSG Hoffenheim, , final score 3-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.00 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  12. Bayer 04 Leverkusen v RB Leipzig Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Bayer 04 Leverkusen at 1.93 · final score 2-0

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Bayer Leverkusen can deliver the goods when it comes to Full-Time Result betting and we’ll back them with confidence against RB Leipzig. The odds of 1.93 look attractive when it comes to the home team.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Bayer 04 Leverkusen at 1.93
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-0 RB Leipzig.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Bayer 04 Leverkusen — RB Leipzig, , final score 2-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.93 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  13. Hamburger SV v 1. FC Köln Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Hamburger SV +0.25 at 1.71 · final score 2-1

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Hamburger SV +0.25 on the Asian Handicap could be the way forward at 1.71.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Hamburger SV +0.25 at 1.71
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Hamburger SV 2-1 1. FC Köln.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Hamburger SV — 1. FC Köln, , final score 2-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.71 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  14. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Paderborn +0.75 at 2.00 look like the best bet against Hoffenheim. We feel confident with this Asian Handicap prediction which means a split stake between +0.5 and +1.0, with a return expected.”

    24 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  15. SV 07 Elversberg v FC Bayern München Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 2.5: SV 07 Elversberg +2.5 at 1.87 · final score 1-2

    13 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    The Asian Handicap route looks attractive considering you can get Elversberg +2.5 at odds of 1.87.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 2.5: SV 07 Elversberg +2.5 at 1.87
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was SV 07 Elversberg 1-2 FC Bayern München.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SV 07 Elversberg — FC Bayern München, , final score 1-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.87 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  16. SV Werder Bremen v FC Augsburg Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: FC Augsburg +0.25 at 1.79 · final score 3-2

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Augsburg have a strong chance against Werder Bremen and we’ll side with the visitors on the Asian Handicap. It’s worth chancing the 1.79 with a +0.25 goal headstart, meaning that our stake is split between 0 and +0.5.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: FC Augsburg +0.25 at 1.79
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was SV Werder Bremen 3-2 FC Augsburg.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SV Werder Bremen — FC Augsburg, , final score 3-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.79 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  17. Borussia M'gladbach v 1. FSV Mainz 05 Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: 1. FSV Mainz 05 at 2.25 · final score 3-4

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Mainz 05 look like the wager to select on the Full-Time Result market, especially as a price of 2.25 is available.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: 1. FSV Mainz 05 at 2.25
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Borussia M'gladbach 3-4 1. FSV Mainz 05.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Borussia M'gladbach — 1. FSV Mainz 05, , final score 3-4
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.25 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  18. Auxerre v Stade Brestois Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Auxerre +0.25 at 1.76 · final score 2-1

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    If you agree with our verdict that Auxerre can avoid defeat against Brest, then you can back the home team with a +0.25 goal start at 1.76. This means our Asian Handicap stake is split equally between 0 and +0.5.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Auxerre +0.25 at 1.76
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was Auxerre 2-1 Stade Brestois.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Auxerre — Stade Brestois, , final score 2-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.76 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  19. Nice v Lille Excluded

    Said: 1X2, match result: Lille at 2.02 · final score 2-1

    20 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    If you concur with our view that Lille will have the upper hand when meeting Nice, then you can wager the away team at 2.02. We’re anticipating a return with this Full-Time Result pick.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Lille at 2.02
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Nice 2-1 Lille.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Nice — Lille, , final score 2-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.02 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  20. Olympique Lyonnais v Stade Rennais Excluded

    Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Stade Rennais +0.25 at 1.97 · final score 4-0

    19 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Rennes have a strong chance against Lyon and we’ll side with the visitors on the Asian Handicap. It’s worth chancing the 1.97 with a +0.25 goal headstart, meaning that our stake is split between 0 and +0.5.
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Stade Rennais +0.25 at 1.97
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Olympique Lyonnais 4-0 Stade Rennais.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Olympique Lyonnais — Stade Rennais, , final score 4-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.97 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “1 May 2017”; it is now “not stated by the source”. The date shown was the source page's own date, set long before this match on a page that is updated over time; it is not the date of this prediction. The page date is now shown separately. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

Other recorded statements (15)

Repeated picks and copies on other platforms. They leave the counts unchanged; each one with its prices is in this page's JSON.

  1. Chelsea — AFC Bournemouth: “back Bournemouth on the Asian Handicap, with the outsiders being given a +0.75 start at odds of 1.90”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  2. Ipswich Town — Fulham: “backing Ipswich +0.25 at odds of 1.68”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  3. Sunderland — Brighton & Hove Albion: “secure odds of 2.32 that the visitors bag a win”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  4. Arsenal — Leeds United: “take the BTTS No option at 1.68”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  5. TSG Hoffenheim — Hamburger SV: “Hamburger SV +1.25 look backable when they clash with Hoffenheim. There’s the chance to get Asian Handicap odds of 1.98 and our money is divided between +1 and +1.5 for the outsiders.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  6. West Bromwich Albion — Birmingham City: “West Brom and Birmingham could be set for a low-scoring contest, with Under 2.5 looking like a great pick. We can visit the Total Goals market and land odds of 1.85 for this prediction.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and

  7. Blackburn Rovers — Cardiff City: “Blackburn look a good bet to defeat Cardiff and we can back the home team at 1.68 with a +0.25 goal start on the Asian Handicap.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  8. Bolton Wanderers — Stoke City: “The odds of 1.62 look too good to pass up when it comes to both Bolton and Stoke scoring here. A nice potential return is on the cards by taking this BTTS Yes option”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  9. Rayo Vallecano — Athletic Club: “The stats suggest that we’ll see both teams finding the net, with Rayo Vallecano and Athletic Club capable of scoring. We find the odds of 1.64 attractive when it comes to the BTTS Yes option.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  10. Borussia Dortmund — SV Werder Bremen: “We’re happy to wager the favourites -1.5 at odds of 1.80 on the Asian Handicap.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  11. AS Roma — Inter: “Our opinion is that the Total Goals market affords great value and we will snap up the 1.61 on offer.”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  12. Fulham — Manchester United: “There’s a very real prospect that Manchester United can have the edge over Fulham and we’ll therefore select the Red Devils when it comes to Full-Time Result. The price of 1.97 looks impossible to…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  13. AFC Bournemouth — Liverpool: “We’ll back Bournemouth +0.25 on the Asian Handicap and split our stake between 0 and +0.5 when the Cherries clash with Liverpool. A victory delivers a nice payout at 1.94 although a draw would…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  14. Manchester City — Sunderland: “We’re heading to the Total Goals market and backing the Over 2.5 selection at a price of 1.61. There’s a strong prospect that Manchester City and Sunderland will land a payout and we’re going into…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

  15. Leeds United — Crystal Palace: “Leeds can’t be ignored when they meet Crystal Palace, especially as betting odds of 1.74 are available for this prediction. The Full-Time Result market offers strong value here, making the Whites…”

    sportsgambler.com · publication date not stated · first recorded by us · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us