Individual tipster · n-tv.de

Michael Siemann: football tipster record

Forecast Record recorded 40 settled live picks by Michael Siemann before kick-off across 29 matches between 9 October and . At our recorded market prices these picks returned −14.4% on the total staked.

Tracking level: Tracked — day 47 of 90 and 101 of 100 needed for Established · 101 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work

Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules

Record summary

Return at our recorded market prices

−14.4%Measured

40 settled picks with an eligible price · 29 matches · picks settled under method v2.2

95% interval −47.5% to +20.9%

Won 19 of 40 (47.5%) at average odds 2.08; those prices implied 54.9% (including bookmaker margin).

Eligible prices were available for 40 of the 99 selections checked against the result.

Copy citation

Forecast Record recorded 40 settled live picks by Michael Siemann before kick-off across 29 matches between 9 October and 1 November 2026. At our recorded market prices these picks returned −14.4% on the total staked. Of the 167 predictions we hold for Michael Siemann, 109 are linked to matches: 99 were recorded by us before kick-off, 2 archived before kick-off by an independent web archive and 8 first found after kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.

Previously published citation

Forecast Record recorded 40 settled live picks by Michael Siemann before kick-off across 29 matches between 9 October and 1 November 2026. At our recorded market prices these picks returned −14.4% on the total staked. Of the 167 predictions we hold for Michael Siemann, 109 are linked to matches: 99 were recorded by us before kick-off, 2 archived before kick-off by an independent web archive and 8 first found after the match. Figures as of .

https://forecastrecord.com/authors/michael-siemann/

569 statements read → 167 predictions → 109 linked to matches → 99 recorded before kick-off → 99 outcome-checked → 40 at our recorded market price (+17 at other prices) · 8 found after kick-off (not in the return)

2 archived before kick-off → 2 outcome-checked → 2 at archived prices. Archive and live records are separate.

On 40 picks with a stated price, the author's price was above our market price on 5 (12.5%), within 5.0% on 35; median difference 0.4%.

Measured: settled by us from the final score · Stated: the author’s own claim, shown as published.

Tipster, source and record definitions

Compare football tipsters and sources

Michael Siemann said: Tendenz

Sieg Frankfurt 1

Gerade vor wenigen Tagen hat die SG Eintracht Frankfurt den HSV mit 3:1 besiegt.

Quote 1,62 . It was settled as won at 1.57, data as of 7 November 2026.
Said → happened: Eintracht Frankfurt — Hamburger SV — Eintracht Frankfurt — Won; price taken 1.57; bankroll change 57.00.
Reconstructed bankroll of Michael Siemann (at an independent odds snapshot): 9,423.52 points after 40 settled picks, 0 top-ups, data as of 2026-11-07.
Bankroll card: Reconstructed bankroll — 9,423.52; settled picks 40; top-ups 0.
Michael Siemann football prediction record: 40 settled live picks on 29 matches, 9 October 2026 – 1 November 2026; return at our recorded market price −14.4%.
Michael Siemann: 40 settled live picks on 29 matches, – . Figures as of .

Latest outcomes

From the headline series: 40 settled picks at our recorded market prices

Newest first · each result opens its evidence on this page

Return over time

100 points per pick
Cumulative points at our recorded market prices40 settled picks, final result -576.48 points.0-576.48 points9 Oct1 Nov

Recorded by us before kick-off: Net result −576.48 points on 40 settled live picks · Lowest point −861.01 points.

Recorded before kick-off · dated by match day

Show chart as a table
Return over time
DateSettled picksCumulative points
1-100.00
5-140.00
6-240.00
8-440.00
9-540.00
11-611.01
13-661.01
15-861.01
24-442.39
25-542.39
27-512.39
38-533.48
40-576.48

By market and competition

Recorded before kick-off · at our recorded market prices

Markets

Markets
MarketWonReturnAvg odds
Match result8/20−16.1% Small sample (20)2.58
Both teams to score4 W / 4 L— Small sample (8)1.43
Over/under goals5 W / 3 L— Small sample (8)1.65
Double chance2 W / 2 L— Small sample (4)1.75

Competitions

Competitions
CompetitionWonReturnAvg odds
Bundesliga16/31−6.0%1.98
UEFA Champions League2 W / 2 L— Small sample (4)2.00
Germany DFB Pokal1 W / 1 L— Small sample (2)3.55
UEFA Europa League0 W / 2 L— Small sample (2)2.39
2. Bundesliga0 W / 1 L— Small sample (1)2.10

Both tables count the same 40 settled live picks as the headline number.

Recorded picks and results

1–20 of 167

On this page: 20 settled · 0 pending · 0 excluded from the return

Eintracht Frankfurt 3-1 Hamburger SV ·

1X2: Eintracht Frankfurt1.57 market priceRecorded 22.8 h before kick-offWon
Tendenz Sieg Frankfurt 1 Gerade vor wenigen Tagen hat die SG Eintracht Frankfurt den HSV mit 3:1 besiegt. Quote 1,62 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.62, market 1.57, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

1. FC Union Berlin 1-1 1. FC Köln ·

1X2: 1. FC Köln2.55 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offLost
Sieg Köln 2 Beste Quote 2.65
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 2.65, market 2.55, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Karlsruher SC 2-1 1. FC Heidenheim ·

Over/Under 4.5 goals: under 4.51.27Recorded 49.5 h before kick-offWonno market price · not in the headline series
Tore Unter 4,5 Tore Heidenheim hat die letzten fünf Ligaspiele mit weniger Toren zu Ende gebracht. Quote 1,27 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.27, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Karlsruher SC 2-1 1. FC Heidenheim ·

1X2: 1. FC Heidenheim2.10 market priceRecorded 49.5 h before kick-offLost
Tendenz Sieg Heidenheim 2 Beide Teams sind nicht in Form; aber Heidenheim hat als Bundesliga-Absteiger die größere Qualität im Kader. Quote 2,27 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 2.27, market 2.10, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

FC Bayern München 2-2 Borussia Dortmund ·

BTTS: yes1.43 market priceRecorded 47.3 h before kick-offWon
Tore Beide Teams treffen B2S In den letzten fünf direkten Duellen beider Vereine gab es Tore und Gegentore zu sehen. Quote 1,40 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.40, market 1.43, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Borussia M'gladbach 0-0 SC Paderborn 07 ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.51.48 market priceRecorded 44.3 h before kick-offLost
Über 2,5 Tore Borussia Mönchengladbach hat alle sieben Ligaspiele mit drei oder mehr Treffern beendet. Quote 1,45 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.45, market 1.48, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Borussia M'gladbach 0-0 SC Paderborn 07 ·

1X2: Borussia M'gladbach1.95 market priceRecorded 44.3 h before kick-offLost
Sieg Gladbach 1 Nach dem ersten Saisonsieg und einer grundsätzlichen Steigerung über die letzten Wochen, ist Gladbach in der Saison 26/27 angekommen. Quote 1,93 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.93, market 1.95, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-4 VfB Stuttgart ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.51.30 market priceRecorded 44.5 h before kick-offWon
Über 2,5 Tore Ein Blick auf die letzten sieben Ergebnisse im H2H-Vergleich: 1:3, 1:4, 4:3, 0:0, 4:3, 2:2 und 3:2. Quote 1,30 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.30, market 1.30, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-4 VfB Stuttgart ·

1X2: VfB Stuttgart3.75 market priceRecorded 44.5 h before kick-offWon
Sieg Stuttgart 2 Die letzten zwei Duelle aus der Saison 25/26 gewann Stuttgart mit 3:1 und 4:1. Quote 3,70 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 3.70, market 3.75, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

SV Werder Bremen 2-0 TSG Hoffenheim ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.51.40 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offLost
Über 2,5 Tore Die TSG 1899 Hoffenheim beendete alle sieben Ligaspiele mit mehr als 2,5 Treffern. Quote 1,40 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.40, market 1.40, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

SV Werder Bremen 2-0 TSG Hoffenheim ·

1X2: SV Werder Bremen2.85 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offWon
Sieg Bremen 1 Der SV Werder Bremen gewann zwei Drittel seiner Begegnungen vor eigenem Publikum. Quote 2,85 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 2.85, market 2.85, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

FC Schalke 04 0-2 RB Leipzig ·

Double chance: FC Schalke 04 or draw1.98 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offLost
Tendenz Doppelte Chance 1X RB Leipzig ist auswärts schwach unterwegs; Schalke ist zu Hause nicht übermäßig stark, aber defensiv stabil! Quote 1,95 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.95, market 1.98, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

FC Augsburg 1-2 SC Freiburg ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.51.46 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offWon
Tore Über 2,5 Tore Letzte Saison trennten sich die Teams mit einem 2:2 und 3:1 voneinander. Quote 1,47 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.47, market 1.46, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

FC Augsburg 1-2 SC Freiburg ·

1X2: draw3.80 market priceRecorded 44.8 h before kick-offLost
Tendenz Unentschieden X Drei der letzten vier Heimspiele des FC Augsburg endeten mit einem Remis. Quote 3,75 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 3.75, market 3.80, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Kaiserslautern 0-3 Hertha Berlin ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.52.30Recorded 42 h before kick-offLostno market price · not in the headline series
Tore Unter 2,5 Tore Lautern spielte zuletzt 1:0, 2:0, 0:0 und 1:0; Hertha BSC jüngst mit dem 1:0 und 0:0. Quote 2,30 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 2.30, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Kaiserslautern 0-3 Hertha Berlin ·

Double chance: Kaiserslautern or draw1.62Recorded 42 h before kick-offLostno market price · not in the headline series
Tendenz Doppelte Chance 1X Der 1. FC Kaiserslautern steht daheim bei drei Siegen, einem Remis und 6:0 Toren. Quote 1,62 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.62, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Cottbus 1-2 VfL Bochum ·

BTTS: yes1.40Recorded 47.8 h before kick-offWonno market price · not in the headline series
Tore Beide Teams treffen B2S Vier Spiele in Serie haben die Cottbuser Tore und Gegentreffer im Ergebnis vorzuweisen. Quote 1,40 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.40, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Cottbus 1-2 VfL Bochum ·

1X2: draw3.70Recorded 47.8 h before kick-offLostno market price · not in the headline series
Tendenz Unentschieden X Cottbus spielte zuletzt gegen Heidenheim (1:1) und Nürnberg (1:1), Bochum gegen Wolfsburg (1:1). Quote 3,70 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 3.70, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Arminia Bielefeld 3-1 Eintracht Braunschweig ·

Over/Under 3.5 goals: over 3.52.45Recorded 47.8 h before kick-offWonno market price · not in the headline series
Tore Über 3,5 Tore Die letzten fünf Matches im H2H-Vergleich endeten 4:1, 3:2, 1:1, 3:3 und 4:1. Quote 2,45 bei Interwetten*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 2.45, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Arminia Bielefeld 3-1 Eintracht Braunschweig ·

Double chance: Arminia Bielefeld or draw1.26Recorded 47.8 h before kick-offWonno market price · not in the headline series
Tendenz Doppelte Chance 1X Bielefeld daheim mit zwei Unentschieden und zwei Siegen; Braunschweig auswärts mit drei Pleiten in vier Spielen. Quote 1,26 bei Betano*
n-tv.de
Tipster / Source
Michael Siemann
Prices
Stated 1.26, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report
Statements without a match (58)

They name no match, so the feed lists them by date, first on page 2 (12), page 3 (12).

About this record

Source tracked for Michael Siemann: n-tv.de, observed since .

Share this record

Michael Siemann (overall record): 19/40 pre-match picks won (−14.4% return at our recorded market prices, avg odds 2.08, 9 October–1 November 2026). Every pick recorded before kick-off on Forecast Record: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/michael-siemann/

Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)

Last change · Price rule: independent odds snapshot · Sample: 40 settled live picks, 29 matches · View changes to this record

Data changes. Added later: 6 records added on Found after kick-off; 2 records added on Found after kick-off; 2 records added on from archived copies. The current numbers include them; numbers published earlier, including the record before each match, do not change.

How unusual is this result? Check 40 picks at average odds 2.08 in the simplified calculator

Where Michael Siemann publishes

Published under this name on n-tv.de.

Publishing platforms
PlatformBylinePredictionsSettled picksResult
n-tv.deMichael Siemann16740−14.4% at our recorded market prices

Record card

To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.

<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/michael-siemann/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 9 October 2026 · 167 predictions · last change 31 October 2026</a>

Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence

Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.

How the market price is set

Recorded before kick-off, graded after the match

36 predictions recorded before kick-off. Right in 17 of 36.

Prices implied by market

By market: Match result 8 of 20 (prices implied 44.7% Small sample (20)); Both teams to score 4 of 8 (4 W / 4 L, average odds 1.43) Small sample (8); Over/under goals 5 of 8 (5 W / 3 L, average odds 1.65) Small sample (8); Double chance 2 of 4 (2 W / 2 L, average odds 1.75) Small sample (4).

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReturn at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price409 October – −13.8%−14.4%
Closing price369 October – −13.6%−15.6%

Archived before kick-off · 2 settled archived picks · won 2 of 2

Restored from a copy saved by an independent web archive before kick-off.

2 predictions; 2 checked against the final score.

2 settled selections across 1 match, .

Reconstructed at archived prices: +196 points.

Eligible prices were available for 2 of the 2 selections checked against the result.

Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.

Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices

Won 2 of 2 decided picks; the prices of the same picks implied 59.5%.

By market: Match result 8 of 20 (prices implied 44.7% Small sample (20)); Both teams to score 4 of 8 (4 W / 4 L, average odds 1.43) Small sample (8); Over/under goals 5 of 8 (5 W / 3 L, average odds 1.65) Small sample (8); Double chance 2 of 4 (2 W / 2 L, average odds 1.75) Small sample (4).

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReconstructed at archived prices
Author-quoted price2+155 points+196 points

Found after kick-off · 1 settled after-match pick · won 1 of 1

First Found after kick-off; the date is the one the source states.

8 predictions; 1 checked against the final score.

1 settled selection across 1 match, .

Reconstructed at archived prices: +73 points.

Eligible prices were available for 1 of the 1 selection checked against the result.

Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.

Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices

Won 1 of 1 decided pick; the prices of the same picks implied 57.8%.

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReconstructed at archived prices
Author-quoted price1+82 points+73 points

An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.

Record details and history

Record details

Each title is a fact about past picks, by published rules. How titles work

Are you Michael Siemann? Show your titles on your site → · Confirm it's you

What kind of number is this?

Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick; the time of each pre-match web-archive copy.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: the market price at the moment a restored pick was published.

The four data statuses

What this record covers

We monitor the sources listed below. This is not a complete record of everything Michael Siemann has published.

Source we monitor
n-tv.de
Channels
website
Watched by us
9–31 October 2026
Earlier entries
restored from archives, back to
Without a match page
58 predictions

Stated price vs market

How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.

Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared withPicks>5.0% above>5.0% belowWithinMedian
Our market price when we first recorded the pick405 (12.5%)035+0.4%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 35 of 40 within 5.0% · 5 of 40 more than 5.0% above
Each bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.

Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way.

Largest gaps: 5.30 against 4.80 (+10.4%) · 2.27 against 2.10 (+7.8%)

Author's response

No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.

Respond or request a correction

Coverage and exclusions

One set of records: the author’s statements. Each count is a part of the one above it. What each word means · What coverage says.

Statements
569
Predictions
167
Qualifying picks
61
Settled picks
59

Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.

Statements that are not predictions: 47 opinions and 350 not about a match.

How this return was calculated

Every settled pick in “Recorded before kick-off, at our recorded market price” is a stake of 100 points at our recorded market price, a pre-match snapshot of the same selection. The net result (−576.48 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 40 settled live picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (4,000 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.

Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.

Separate comparison window — last 90 days: −14.4% on 40 live picks settled in this window · 29 matches · 9 October – (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted

Changes to this record

Earlier figures stay here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.

Coverage extended ·

Before
−12.2% on 39 settled picks across 28 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−14.4% on 40 settled picks across 29 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Coverage extended ·

Before
−14.0% on 38 settled picks across 27 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−12.2% on 39 settled picks across 28 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Coverage extended ·

Before
−11.7% on 37 settled picks across 26 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−14.0% on 38 settled picks across 27 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Coverage extended ·

Before
−9.3% on 36 settled picks across 25 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−11.7% on 37 settled picks across 26 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

New results ·

Before
−15.9% on 26 settled picks across 19 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (26)
After
−9.3% on 36 settled picks across 25 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

10 new settled picks from matches played after the previous record update.

New results ·

Before
−18.4% on 24 settled picks across 17 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (24)
After
−15.9% on 26 settled picks across 19 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (26)

2 new settled picks from matches played after the previous record update.

Coverage extended ·

Before
−20.2% on 20 settled picks across 14 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (20)
After
−18.4% on 24 settled picks across 17 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (24)

Added 3 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture); also 1 new result.

New results ·

Before
−23.6% on 19 settled picks across 13 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (19)
After
−20.2% on 20 settled picks across 14 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (20)

1 new settled pick from matches played after the previous record update.

New results ·

Before
−50.9% on 13 settled picks across 9 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (13)
After
−23.6% on 19 settled picks across 13 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (19)

6 new settled picks from matches played after the previous record update.

New results ·

Before
−41.9% on 11 settled picks across 8 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (11)
After
−50.9% on 13 settled picks across 9 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (13)

2 new settled picks from matches played after the previous record update.

Coverage extended ·

Before
−50.5% on 10 settled picks across 8 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (10)
After
−41.9% on 11 settled picks across 8 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (11)

Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Method changed ·

Before
+196.00 points on 2 settled picks across 1 match · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1
After
−50.5% on 10 settled picks across 8 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2 Small sample (10)

The headline rule changed on : the live record at our recorded market price becomes the headline number from 10 settled picks; until then the headline is the record restored from pre-match archive copies, and the live record so far is shown beside it. Was: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only (2 settled picks). Now: independent odds snapshot (10 settled picks).

Archived before kick-off: restored later from a copy that an independent web archive saved before the match started. Definition.

Method changed ·

Before
−384.00 points on 6 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
+196.00 points on 2 settled picks across 1 match · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1

The headline rule changed on : the live record at our recorded market price becomes the headline number from 10 settled picks; until then the headline is the record restored from pre-match archive copies, and the live record so far is shown beside it. Was: independent odds snapshot (6 settled picks). Now: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only (2 settled picks).

New results ·

Before
−284.00 points on 5 settled picks across 4 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−384.00 points on 6 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

1 new settled pick from matches played after the previous record update.

Method changed ·

Before
no published headline number
After
−284.00 points on 5 settled picks across 4 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2

(): the live market price of a pick is the market price at the moment the pick was first recorded, before kick-off. First headline number for this record: 5 settled picks.

Who this is

Last recorded by us
, 7 days before this page's data date
Observed
—
Channels
website

Statements other than predictions (54 shown)

  • “Licht und Schatten liegen beim Hamburger SV derzeit nah beieinander.” — · source
  • “Denn die Frankfurter können auf dem Papier so viel mehr, als sie aktuell zeigen.” — · source
  • “Dieses Spiel ist, wegen der Kölner Auswärtsschwäche, schwer zu bewerten.” — · source
  • “Immerhin spricht das Heimrecht im Stadion an der Alten Försterei für die Eisernen.” — · source
  • “Allerdings haben die Geißböcke moralisch jetzt das leichtere Spiel.” — · source
  • “Die Rote Laterne können die Fohlen aber, wenn überhaupt, dann wohl nur an Union Berlin weiterreichen.” — · source
  • “Die Ausgangslage ist für den Karlsruher SC aber prekärer.” — · source
  • “Beide Bundesligisten haben ihre eigene Baustelle – allerdings jeweils am anderen Ende der Tabelle.” — · source
  • “Verliert die Werkself den Anschluss oder sind die Schwaben ein Abstiegskandidat?” — · source
  • “Können die Knappen mehr, als sich nur in ihrer Rüstung zu verstecken?” — · source
  • “Besonders bei der engen Tabellenlage sind die Wett-Tipps auf Cottbus vs. Bochum daher von” — · source
  • Andererseits endeten die letzten beiden Hamburger Ligaspiele mit einer Null im Ergebnis.

    · Source

  • Riskanter mag das Not2Score (Nicht beide Teams treffen) sein.

    · Source

  • Besonders die jungen Abwehrspieler beim HSV zahlten Lehrgeld.

    · Source

  • Sorgen bereitet den Fans das Torverhältnis von 6:16.

    · Source

  • Interwetten Bonus: Wie für dich gemacht?*

    · Source

  • Frankfurt vs. Hamburg: Wett-Tipp mit Prognose & Quoten – Bundesliga 01.11.2026

    · Source

  • Der 1. FC Köln sollte darauf bedacht sein, seine erste Elf wie im Pokalspiel zu erhalten.

    · Source

  • Beim 1. FC Union Berlin könnte es Änderungen geben – zumindest im Tor.

    · Source

  • Spektakuläres Remis bei beidseitigen Treffern bei bwin: Beide Teams treffen und das Spiel endet unentschieden – 4,50 (statt 4,00)

    · Source

  • 20€ gratis für Union Berlin vs. Köln

    · Source

  • Stand der Quoten: 30.10.2026, Änderungen jederzeit möglich.

    · Source

  • Zusätzlich 80€ für die erste Einzahlung

    · Source

  • Betano Bonus: Hält das Angebot, was es verspricht?*

    · Source

  • Urbig wird vermutlich nur dann spielen, wenn Neuer nicht völlig fit ist.

    · Source

  • Lust auf einen neuen Bonus? Hier geht es zu Interwetten!*

    · Source

  • Medienkooperation

    · Source

  • Zwar ist Nicolas im Tor von Borussia Mönchengladbach laut unserer Vorhersage nicht fehlerfrei

    · Source

  • Prüfe die Variablen vom Interwetten Bonus.*

    · Source

  • Prüfe diesen Wert gerne über den Wettanbieter Vergleich.

    · Source

  • Hast du Lust auf den Interwetten Bonus?*

    · Source

  • Wir lassen die KI-Prognose bewusst außen vor und setzen auf Experten, die sich selbst mit dem Duell befassen.

    · Source

  • Ebenfalls interessant Augsburg vs. Freiburg: Wett-Tipp mit Prognose & Quoten – Bundesliga 31.10.2026

    · Source

  • Mit dem Betano Bonus bist du bestens aufgestellt.*

    · Source

  • Änderungen an der Leverkusener Startelf halten wir für Realistisch.

    · Source

  • Interwetten Bonus: Prüfe die Details!*

    · Source

  • Ebenfalls interessant Karlsruhe vs. Heidenheim: Wett-Tipp mit Prognose & Quoten – 2. Bundesliga 31.10.2026

    · Source

  • Das Match gegen Mainz nehmen wir als Blaupause für die voraussichtliche Aufstellung des SV Werder.

    · Source

  • Damals gewann Hoffenheim mit 2:0 und 1:0.

    · Source

  • Daheim gab es zwei Dreier und ein Remis (8:5 Treffer) zu sehen.

    · Source

  • Aktuell mischen die Bremer im Kampf um die Europa-Plätze mit.

    · Source

  • Form, Effizienz und jüngere Leistungswerte können ein anderes Bild zeichnen als der bloße Blick

    · Source

  • Trifft der Betano Bonus deinen Geschmack?*

    · Source

  • Unsere Reihenfolge bei Bremen vs. Hoffenheim ist bewusst einfach: erst selbst analysieren

    · Source

  • Dort sind die Bremer auf Platz sechs zu finden, Hoffenheim ist Zehnter.

    · Source

  • Im Pokal flog der SV Werder trotz eines starken Matches gegen den BVB raus.

    · Source

  • Es ist schwer zu beziffern, wie viele Punkte Karius den Schalkern im Tor schon gesichert hat.

    · Source

  • Mit dem Interwetten Neukundenbonus erweiterst du deinen Spielraum.*

    · Source

  • Ebenfalls interessant Gladbach vs. Paderborn: Wett-Tipp mit Prognose & Quoten – Bundesliga 31.10.2026

    · Source

  • Was uns zum VfL Bochum führt, wo nach wie vor Horn das Tor hütet.

    · Source

  • Lotka ist der Mann des Vertrauens zwischen den Pfosten des FC Energie Cottbus.

    · Source

  • Torwart Hoffmann musste zuletzt verletzt raus. Wir erwarten ihn trotzdem im Tor.

    · Source

  • Erneut erwarten wir Kersken im Tor von Arminia Bielefeld.

    · Source

  • Reimann ist der Schlussmann beim 1. FC Magdeburg.

    · Source

The full list is in the JSON and CSV downloads of this page.

Is this your record? Share or embed it: card, embed code and how to respond.

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page. A download includes the full machine list when the page shows a filtered view.

Share cards of this record (4)

For the author of this record (1)

Check us

Calculations for the displayed picks

Separate price series for each prediction; only the headline series enters the main return.
PredictionSeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
Eintracht Frankfurt v Hamburger SV WonAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — Eintracht Frankfurt1.62100.00Won62.00v2.2
Eintracht Frankfurt v Hamburger SV WonAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — Eintracht Frankfurt1.57100.00Won57.00v2.2
1. FC Union Berlin v 1. FC Köln LostAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — 1. FC Köln2.65100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
1. FC Union Berlin v 1. FC Köln LostAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — 1. FC Köln2.55100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Karlsruher SC v 1. FC Heidenheim WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 4.5 goals — under 4.51.27100.00Won27.00v2.2
Karlsruher SC v 1. FC Heidenheim LostAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — 1. FC Heidenheim2.27100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Karlsruher SC v 1. FC Heidenheim LostAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — 1. FC Heidenheim2.10100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
FC Bayern München v Borussia Dortmund WonAt the author's stated priceBoth teams to score — yes1.40100.00Won40.00v2.2
FC Bayern München v Borussia Dortmund WonAt an independent odds snapshotBoth teams to score — yes1.43100.00Won43.48v2.2
Borussia M'gladbach v SC Paderborn 07 LostAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.45100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Borussia M'gladbach v SC Paderborn 07 LostAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.48100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Borussia M'gladbach v SC Paderborn 07 LostAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — Borussia M'gladbach1.93100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Borussia M'gladbach v SC Paderborn 07 LostAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — Borussia M'gladbach1.95100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Bayer 04 Leverkusen v VfB Stuttgart WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.30100.00Won30.00v2.2
Bayer 04 Leverkusen v VfB Stuttgart WonAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.30100.00Won30.16v2.2
Bayer 04 Leverkusen v VfB Stuttgart WonAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — VfB Stuttgart3.70100.00Won270.00v2.2
Bayer 04 Leverkusen v VfB Stuttgart WonAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — VfB Stuttgart3.75100.00Won275.00v2.2
SV Werder Bremen v TSG Hoffenheim LostAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.40100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
SV Werder Bremen v TSG Hoffenheim LostAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.40100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
SV Werder Bremen v TSG Hoffenheim WonAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — SV Werder Bremen2.85100.00Won185.00v2.2
SV Werder Bremen v TSG Hoffenheim WonAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — SV Werder Bremen2.85100.00Won184.50v2.2
FC Schalke 04 v RB Leipzig LostAt the author's stated priceDouble chance — FC Schalke 04 or draw1.95100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
FC Schalke 04 v RB Leipzig LostAt an independent odds snapshotDouble chance — FC Schalke 04 or draw1.98100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
FC Augsburg v SC Freiburg WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.47100.00Won47.00v2.2
FC Augsburg v SC Freiburg WonAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.51.46100.00Won45.77v2.2
FC Augsburg v SC Freiburg LostAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — draw3.75100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
FC Augsburg v SC Freiburg LostAt an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — draw3.80100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Kaiserslautern v Hertha Berlin LostAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.52.30100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Kaiserslautern v Hertha Berlin LostAt the author's stated priceDouble chance — Kaiserslautern or draw1.62100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Cottbus v VfL Bochum WonAt the author's stated priceBoth teams to score — yes1.40100.00Won40.00v2.2
Cottbus v VfL Bochum LostAt the author's stated price1X2, match result — draw3.70100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Arminia Bielefeld v Eintracht Braunschweig WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 3.5 goals — over 3.52.45100.00Won145.00v2.2
Arminia Bielefeld v Eintracht Braunschweig WonAt the author's stated priceDouble chance — Arminia Bielefeld or draw1.26100.00Won26.00v2.2

Record definitions and related evidence