Individual tipster · sportinglife.com

Jake Osgathorpe: football tipster record — archive reconstruction

Forecast Record restored 24 settled archived picks by Jake Osgathorpe from copies archived before kick-off, across 22 matches between and . Reconstructed at archived prices, these picks returned +29.3% on the total staked.

Tracking level: Established · 223 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work

Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules

Record summary

Archived before kick-off, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off)

+29.3%Measured Small sample (24)

24 settled picks with an eligible price · 22 matches · picks settled under reconstruction method 1.1

95% interval −24.5% to +83.8% Small sample (24)

Won 13 of 24 (54.2% Small sample (24)) at average odds 2.46; those prices implied 42.8% Small sample (24) (including bookmaker margin).

Eligible prices were available for 24 of the 186 selections checked against the result.

Copy citation

Forecast Record restored 24 settled archived picks by Jake Osgathorpe from copies archived before kick-off, across 22 matches between 17 August 2024 and 8 April 2026. Reconstructed at archived prices, these picks returned +29.3% on the total staked. Live record so far: won 3 of 5 settled live picks at our recorded market price. Of the 499 predictions we hold for Jake Osgathorpe, 375 are linked to matches: 45 were recorded by us before kick-off, 301 archived before kick-off by an independent web archive, 21 from the source’s own history and 8 first found after kick-off; 9 are excluded while the attribution is under review. Figures as of 7 November 2026.

Previously published citation

Forecast Record restored 24 settled archived picks by Jake Osgathorpe from copies archived before kick-off, across 22 matches between 17 August 2024 and 8 April 2026. Reconstructed at archived prices, these picks returned +29.3% on the total staked. Live record so far: won 3 of 5 settled live picks at our recorded market price. Of the 499 predictions we hold for Jake Osgathorpe, 375 are linked to matches: 45 were recorded by us before kick-off, 301 archived before kick-off by an independent web archive, 21 from the source’s own history and 8 first found after the match; 9 are excluded while the attribution is under review. Figures as of .

https://forecastrecord.com/authors/jake-osgathorpe/

1,144 statements read → 499 predictions → 375 linked to matches → 45 recorded before kick-off → 37 outcome-checked → 5 at our recorded market price (+65 at other prices) · 8 found after kick-off (not in the return)

301 archived before kick-off → 186 outcome-checked → 24 at archived prices. Archive and live records are separate.

On 5 picks with a stated price, the author's price was above our market price on 1 Small sample (5), within 5.0% on 4.

Measured: settled by us from the final score · Stated: the author’s own claim, shown as published.

Tipster, source and record definitions

Compare football tipsters and sources

Jake Osgathorpe said: 1pts Under 2.5 goals at 5/4 (Betfair, Betway). It was settled as won at 2.20, data as of 7 November 2026.
Said → happened: Fulham — Newcastle United — under 2.5 — Won; price taken 2.20; bankroll change 120.00.
Reconstructed bankroll of Jake Osgathorpe (at an independent odds snapshot): 10,101.18 points after 5 settled picks, 0 top-ups, data as of 2026-11-07.
Bankroll card: Reconstructed bankroll — 10,101.18; settled picks 5; top-ups 0.
Jake Osgathorpe football prediction record: 24 settled archived picks on 22 matches, 17 August 2024 – 8 April 2026; reconstructed at archived prices +29.3%.
Jake Osgathorpe: 24 settled archived picks on 22 matches, – . Figures as of .

Latest outcomes

From the headline series: 24 settled picks at archived prices

WLWWLLLLWW

Newest first · each result opens its evidence on this page

Return over time

100 points per pick
Cumulative points at archived prices24 settled picks, final result 702.50 points.0702.50 points17 Aug 20248 Apr 2026

Reconstructed at archived prices: Net result +702.50 points on 24 settled archived picks · Lowest point −200 points.

Archived before kick-off · dated by match day

Show chart as a table
Return over time
DateSettled picksCumulative points
1-100.00
2-200.00
3-107.00
50.50
694.50
9-15.50
10204.50
11361.50
12566.00
14567.50
16735.50
17635.50
19435.50
20335.50
21473.00
24702.50

By market and competition

Archived before kick-off · reconstructed at archived prices

Markets

Markets
MarketWonReturnAvg odds
Match result3 W / 3 L— Small sample (6)2.72
Over/under goals2 W / 4 L— Small sample (6)2.17
Result and both teams to score1 W / 4 L— Small sample (5)2.69
Cards over/under2 W / 0 L— Small sample (2)1.96
Win to nil2 W / 0 L— Small sample (2)2.95
Both teams to score1 W / 0 L— Small sample (1)1.93
Double chance1 W / 0 L— Small sample (1)2.57
Result and total goals1 W / 0 L— Small sample (1)1.90

Competitions

Competitions
CompetitionWonReturnAvg odds
Premier League11/2122.5% Small sample (21)2.44
UEFA Champions League2 W / 1 L— Small sample (3)2.56

Both tables count the same 24 settled archived picks as the headline number.

Recorded picks and results

1–20 of 499

On this page: 20 settled · 0 pending · 0 excluded from the return

Fulham 1-1 Newcastle United ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.52.25Recorded 51.6 h before kick-offWon
1pts Under 2.5 goals at 5/4 (Betfair, Betway)
sportinglife.com
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 2.25, market 2.20, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Leeds United 1-0 Tottenham Hotspur ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.51.91Recorded 49.1 h before kick-offWon
2pts Under 2.5 goals at 10/11 (bet365)
sportinglife.com
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 1.91, market 1.88, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Benfica 3-1 Lech Poznań ·

Player to score: Jhon Durán to score1.91Recorded 46.6 h before kick-offLost
2.25pts Jhon Duran to score anytime at 10/11 (Sky Bet)
sportinglife.com
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 1.91, market 1.61, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

AFC Bournemouth 2-0 Leeds United ·

Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.51.95Recorded 50.8 h before kick-offWon
UNDER 2.5 GOALS is worth a look, and at 20/21 it's well worth backing on the south coast.
sportinglife.com
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 1.95, market 1.93, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Ipswich Town 1-1 Nottingham Forest ·

Team goals over/under 1.5: Nottingham Forest over 1.52.05Recorded 32.7 h before kick-offLost
1.5pts Nottingham Forest to score 2+ goals at 21/20 (Coral, Ladbrokes)
sportinglife.com
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 2.05, market 1.97, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Cite · Report

Manchester City 3-0 Crystal Palace ·

Statement: Both teams to score: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Paris Saint-Germain 2-0 Liverpool ·

Statement: To win to nil: Paris Saint-Germain to win to nilwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published Not stated, recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Not stated
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Paris Saint-Germain 2-0 Liverpool ·

Statement: 1X2, match result: Paris Saint-Germainwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published Not stated, recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Not stated
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

FC Barcelona 0-2 Atlético Madrid ·

Statement: Match result and both teams to score: FC Barcelona win, both teams to score: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published Not stated, recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Not stated
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Real Madrid 1-2 FC Bayern München ·

Statement: Over/Under 3.5 cards: over 3.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Sporting CP 0-1 Arsenal ·

Statement: Both teams to score: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

AEK Larnaca 1-1 Crystal Palace ·

Statement: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

SSC Napoli 2-3 Chelsea ·

Statement: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Rangers 0-2 AS Roma ·

Statement: To win to nil: AS Roma to win to nilwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

SK Slavia Praha 0-3 Arsenal ·

Statement: To win to nil: Arsenal to win to nil at 2.0without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

FK Crvena Zvezda 1-1 Celtic ·

Statement: Draw no bet: FK Crvena Zvezda at 2.0without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Void
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Manchester City 2-0 SSC Napoli ·

Statement: 1X2, match result: SSC Napoliwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Manchester City 2-0 SSC Napoli ·

Statement: Double chance: draw or SSC Napoliwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Paris Saint-Germain 2-2 Tottenham Hotspur ·

Statement: Over/Under 3.5 cards: under 3.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
Settlement rule
Cite · Report

Aston Villa 2-0 Tottenham Hotspur ·

To win to nil: Aston Villa to win to nil2.80Found after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
1pt Aston Villa to win to nil vs Spurs (19:30) at 9/5 (Beftair, Betvictor)
web.archive.org
Tipster / Source
Jake Osgathorpe
Prices
Stated 2.80, market —, closing 2.38
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
vretro-1.0
Cite · Report
Statements without a match (115)

They name no match, so the feed lists them by date among pages 2–26.

About this record

Source tracked for Jake Osgathorpe: sportinglife.com, observed since .

Share this record

Jake Osgathorpe on Forecast Record: 13 won of 24 settled archived before kick-off picks (avg odds 2.46, small sample, –8 April 2026). Every pick archived before kick-off: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/jake-osgathorpe/

Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)

Last change · Reconstruction method 1.1 · Price rule: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Sample: 24 settled archived picks, 22 matches · View changes to this record

Data changes. 1 record shown here has been corrected; the last correction was on , with its reason in the corrections log. Corrections log. Added later: 56 records added on from archived copies; 166 records added on from archived copies; 19 records added on from the source's own history; 11 more records added on other dates. The current numbers include them; numbers published earlier, including the record before each match, do not change.

Source-reported: dated by the source's own published history, without an independent archive copy from before kick-off. Definition.

This page combines Jake Osgathorpe across 2 platforms. The record above counts each prediction once, even when the same pick (match, market and selection) appeared on more than one platform; each platform keeps its own total under “Where Jake Osgathorpe publishes”.

Reconstructed at archived prices: these picks were restored from copies of the author’s pages that an independent web archive saved before kick-off, at the last pre-match archive prices, bookmaker margin included.

9 predictions are kept out of this record’s totals: the article byline and the named tipster differ.

Where Jake Osgathorpe publishes

Identity checked on against public sources: sportinglife.com.

Publishing platforms
PlatformBylinePredictionsSettled picksResult
Sporting Life, author pages · record used for this returnJake Osgathorpe47224+29.3% reconstructed at archived prices
Sporting Life, author pagesJake Osgathorpe270—

Totals are kept per platform. Predictions from every platform are listed below, each marked with its platform.

Its own published record, checked

  • · Jake Osgathorpe — Not directly comparable: the season total is published without its rows, and the stake of each bet (0.25 to 2.5 points) sits outside the published record, so the total is the source’s own figure; the claimed period starts on , before our collection of this source began ().
  • · Jake Osgathorpe — Its own rows add up to +7.45 points, not the +7.95 claimed. Not directly comparable: each row of its record is a whole column of several bets with one total, and the stake of each bet (0.25 to 2.5 points) sits outside the published record, so the total is the source’s own figure.

How the source counts and how we recount the same picks: each check, and the full list of record checks.

Record card

To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.

<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/jake-osgathorpe/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 28 September 2026 · 499 predictions · last change 7 November 2026</a>

Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence

Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.

How the market price is set

Recorded before kick-off, graded after the match

13 predictions recorded before kick-off. Right in 8 of 13.

Prices implied by market

By market: Over/under goals 3 of 3 (3 W / 0 L, average odds 2.17) Small sample (3); Player to score 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1); Team goals 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1).

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReturn at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price523 October – +111 points+101.18 points
Closing price323 October – +80.46 points+81.18 points

Score forecasts without a betting market price

Outcome checked. No betting return is attributed to these score forecasts.

1 of 21 score forecasts named the exact score (4.8%).

The result implied by the named score was right in 6 of 18 matches; the market favourite was right in 8 of the same 18 matches.

A pre-match market favourite is known for 18 of 21 forecasts; the comparison uses only those.

The market favourite is the home win, draw or away win with the lowest price in our own odds snapshot taken before kick-off.

The implied result follows from the named score (2-1 implies a home win).

Archived before kick-off · 24 settled archived picks · +29.3%

Restored from a copy saved by an independent web archive before kick-off.

301 predictions; 186 checked against the final score.

24 settled selections across 22 matches, – .

Reconstructed at archived prices: +29.3% (95.0% interval −24.5% to +83.8%).

Eligible prices were available for 24 of the 186 selections checked against the result.

Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.

Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices

Won 13 of 24 decided picks (54.2%); the prices of the same picks implied 42.8%.

By market: Over/under goals 3 of 3 (3 W / 0 L, average odds 2.17) Small sample (3); Player to score 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1); Team goals 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1).

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReconstructed at archived prices
Author-quoted price20 – +37.3%+28.6%
Closing price, aggregator51 February – −11.54 points−18.50 points

Score forecasts without a betting market price

Outcome checked. No betting return is attributed to these score forecasts.

14 of 123 score forecasts named the exact score (11.4%).

The result implied by the named score was right in 63 of 123 matches; the market favourite was right in 66 of the same 123 matches.

The market favourite is the home win, draw or away win with the lowest last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off).

The implied result follows from the named score (2-1 implies a home win).

Found after kick-off

First Found after kick-off; the date is the one the source states.

8 predictions; 0 checked against the final score.

Source-reported history · 18 settled source-reported picks · +7.3%

The time and the pick are known only from the source’s own history; it is the basis of the record check and never part of the evidenced total.

21 predictions; 19 checked against the final score.

18 settled selections across 17 matches, – .

Reconstructed at archived prices: +7.3% (95.0% interval −47.5% to +66.8%).

Eligible prices were available for 18 of the 19 selections checked against the result.

Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.

Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices

Won 9 of 18 decided picks (50.0%); the prices of the same picks implied 47.6%.

By market: Over/under goals 3 of 3 (3 W / 0 L, average odds 2.17) Small sample (3); Player to score 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1); Team goals 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L) Small sample (1).

The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.

Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
PriceSame picksPeriodAt that priceReconstructed at archived prices
Author-quoted price219 February – +200 points+171 points

An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.

Record details and history

Record details

Record history · 26

  • Exact score 2–0 · Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–0 · Chelsea v Manchester United · · archive record
  • 4/5 result calls right · week of · archive record
  • Exact score 1–0 · Chelsea v Everton · · archive record
  • Draw at 4.10 · Arsenal v Brentford · · archive record
  • Draw at 4.00 · Manchester City v Brighton & Hove Albion · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · Everton v West Ham United · · archive record
  • Home win at 3.04 · Wolverhampton Wanderers v Aston Villa · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · Nottingham Forest v Liverpool · · archive record
  • 4/5 result calls right · week of · archive record
  • Exact score 2–1 · Aston Villa v Manchester City · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · West Ham United v Brighton & Hove Albion · · archive record
  • Draw at 3.40 · Everton v Brentford · · archive record
  • Exact score 2–2 · Wolverhampton Wanderers v Crystal Palace · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · Everton v Fulham · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · Brentford v West Ham United · · archive record
  • Draw at 3.73 · Brighton & Hove Albion v Nottingham Forest · · archive record
  • Draw at 3.55 · Manchester City v Arsenal · · archive record
  • Draw at 3.52 · Crystal Palace v Manchester United · · archive record
  • Exact score 3–1 · Aston Villa v Wolverhampton Wanderers · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–2 · Wolverhampton Wanderers v Newcastle United · · archive record
  • 6/7 result calls right · week of · archive record
  • Aug 2024: 9 of 12 result calls right · prices implied 5.8 · archive record
  • Draw at 3.40 · Ipswich Town v Fulham · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–2 · Leicester City v Aston Villa · · archive record
  • Exact score 1–1 · Nottingham Forest v Wolverhampton Wanderers · · archive record

Each title is a fact about past picks, by published rules. How titles work

Are you Jake Osgathorpe? Show your titles on your site → · Confirm it's you

What kind of number is this?

Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick; the time of each pre-match web-archive copy.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: the market price at the moment a restored pick was published; who made the predictions whose attribution is under review.

The four data statuses

What this record covers

We monitor the sources listed below. This is not a complete record of everything Jake Osgathorpe has published.

Source we monitor
sportinglife.com
Channels
website
Watched by us
28 September –
Earlier entries
restored from archives, back to
Without a match page
115 predictions
Attribution under review
9 predictions, kept out of this record’s totals

Stated price vs market

How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.

Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared withPicks>5.0% above>5.0% belowWithinMedian
Our market price when we first recorded the pick51 (20.0%)04+2.3%
Closing market price (restored)53 (60.0%)11+9.3%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 4 of 5 within 5.0% · 1 of 5 more than 5.0% above · Closing market price (restored) · 1 of 5 more than 5.0% below · 1 of 5 within 5.0% · 3 of 5 more than 5.0% above
Each bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.

Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off); Closing market price (restored) — the closing market price of the same selection (restored history). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way. The closing price is the final price before kick-off. The price when the pick was published is unknown for restored history, so this row shows the distance to where the market closed.

Largest gaps: 1.91 against 1.61 (+18.6%) · 3.50 against 3.10 (+12.9%) · 2.10 against 1.89 (+11.4%)

Author's response

No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.

Respond or request a correction

Coverage and exclusions

One set of records: the author’s statements. Each count is a part of the one above it. What each word means · What coverage says.

Statements
1,144
Predictions
499
Qualifying picks
134
Settled picks
94

Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.

Statements that are not predictions: 266 opinions and 377 not about a match.

How this return was calculated

Every settled pick in “Archived before kick-off, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off)” is a stake of 100 points at the last pre-match archive price, a reconstruction at archived prices on picks archived before kick-off only. The net result (+702.50 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 24 settled archived picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (2,400 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.

Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.

Separate comparison window — last 90 days: +101.18 points on 5 live picks settled in this window · 5 matches · 23 October – (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted

Changes to this record

The headline number above is (reconstruction method 1.1, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only). When it changes, the earlier figure stays here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.

Data corrected ·

Before
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)
After
+29.3% on 24 settled picks across 22 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (24)

Data corrected: 4 picks left the headline sample.

Coverage extended ·

Before
+29.3% on 24 settled picks across 22 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (24)
After
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)

Added 4 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Data corrected ·

Before
+23.3% on 26 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (26)
After
+29.3% on 24 settled picks across 22 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (24)

Data corrected: 2 picks left the headline sample.

Data corrected ·

Before
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)
After
+23.3% on 26 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (26)

Data corrected: 2 picks left the headline sample.

Coverage extended ·

Before
+23.3% on 26 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (26)
After
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)

Added 2 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Data corrected ·

Before
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)
After
+23.3% on 26 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (26)

Data corrected: 2 picks left the headline sample.

Coverage extended ·

Before
+15.0% on 25 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (25)
After
+21.6% on 28 settled picks across 26 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (28)

Added 3 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).

Method changed ·

Before
+20.5% on 60 settled picks across 48 matches · author's stated odds, restored · Reconstruction method 1.0
After
+15.0% on 25 settled picks across 24 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1 Small sample (25)

The headline rule changed on : the headline is the live record at our recorded market price; without one, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off) on picks archived before kick-off only. Picks first Found after kick-off no longer enter the headline number. Was: author's stated odds, restored (60 settled picks). Now: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only (25 settled picks).

Who this is

Last recorded by us
, the date of this page's data
Observed
—
Channels
website

Statements other than predictions (34 shown)

  • “should they avoid defeat at the Emirates it would go down as their best result of the season so far.” — · source
  • “City have conceded multiple goals in six of their last nine, making them an easy swerve all things considered” — · source
  • “Manchester City are a tempting 8/11 to win here.” — · source
  • “Simon Hooper is the referee here and he's a good appointment for card backers” — · source
  • “At least one centre-back has been booked in all of their last their last five games across the Premier League and Europa League” — · source
  • “The angle to attack here is a card for an Ipswich centre-back.” — · source
  • “Bournemouth are rolling right now. They have won seven straight games in all competitions” — · source
  • “Mac Allister should get ample opportunity to pull the trigger.” — · source
  • “Palace actually prop up the division for shots conceded this season” — · source
  • “given the amount of shots the Reds are taking and the Eagles are conceding, we'll head to the player shots market.” — · source
  • “That latter figure is alarming.” — · source
  • “their attack continues to underwhelm.” — · source
  • “Liverpool were poor last weekend against Arsenal and were beaten in Turkiye in midweek against Fenerbache” — · source
  • “making this a hard one to call, especially with Brighton having played a taxing schedule” — · source
  • “We have to expect some sort of a reaction from United here” — · source
  • All odds correct at 15:30 GMT (06/11/26)

    · Source

  • Youri Tielemans joined Manchester United from Aston Villa in the summer

    · Source

  • Now on this bet we are taking Maguire without super sub as the prices for him to be carded with firms

    · Source

  • Both the Neto bets are slightly better priced with BetVictor (10/11 and 5/1), but we will be taking

    · Source

  • *All player prop prices chosen with Super Sub bar Maguire card

    · Source

  • which did mean a glance at Everton win to nil at 9/4. But, I'm not ready to trust the Toffees in that regard.

    · Source

  • with Coventry posting the worst attacking numbers in the league through nine games (0.92 xGF per game)

    · Source

  • Moyes' men are 8/11 to win the game on Friday which looks about right

    · Source

  • Odd correct at 18:00 GMT (03/11/26)

    · Source

  • Possibly more bets to be added...

    · Source

  • Odds correct at 14:00 GMT (27/10/26)

    · Source

  • Doku drew four fouls last weekend at Villa Park, causing all sorts of problems

    · Source

  • So Michael Carrick is going to be in the dugout for this game, making it anyones guess as to what version of Manchester United we will get.

    · Source

  • TV: Sky Sports Main Event

    · Source

  • Live odds, form and stats

    · Source

  • The Blues will be without Cole Palmer and Joao Pedro for this game, while starting goalkeeper Emi Martinez

    · Source

  • So Michael Carrick is going to be in the dugout for this game,

    · Source

  • The Blues will be without Cole Palmer and Joao Pedro for this game, while starting goalkeeper Emi Martinez is out too.

    · Source

  • So Michael Carrick is going to be in the dugout for this game

    · Source

The full list is in the JSON and CSV downloads of this page.

Is this your record? Share or embed it: card, embed code and how to respond.

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page. A download includes the full machine list when the page shows a filtered view.

Share cards of this record (4)

For the author of this record (1)

Check us

Calculations for the displayed picks

Separate price series for each prediction; only the headline series enters the main return.
PredictionSeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
Fulham v Newcastle United WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.52.25100.00Won125.00v2.2
Fulham v Newcastle United WonAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.52.20100.00Won120.00v2.2
Leeds United v Tottenham Hotspur WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.51.91100.00Won91.00v2.2
Leeds United v Tottenham Hotspur WonAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.51.88100.00Won87.72v2.2
Benfica v Lech Poznań LostAt the author's stated pricePlayer to score — Jhon Durán to score1.91100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Benfica v Lech Poznań LostAt an independent odds snapshotPlayer to score — Jhon Durán to score1.61100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
AFC Bournemouth v Leeds United WonAt the author's stated priceOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.51.95100.00Won95.00v2.2
AFC Bournemouth v Leeds United WonAt an independent odds snapshotOver/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.51.93100.00Won93.46v2.2
Ipswich Town v Nottingham Forest LostAt the author's stated priceTeam goals over/under 1.5 — Nottingham Forest over 1.52.05100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Ipswich Town v Nottingham Forest LostAt an independent odds snapshotTeam goals over/under 1.5 — Nottingham Forest over 1.51.97100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur WonRestored, at the author's stated priceTo win to nil — Aston Villa to win to nil2.80100.00Won180.00retro-1.0
Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur WonRestored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off)To win to nil — Aston Villa to win to nil2.38100.00Won137.50retro-1.1

Record definitions and related evidence