Forecast Record Tips today

SportsGambler: football prediction record

SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 28 of 107

Page 28 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 521–540 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 28 of 107

Showing 521–540 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

18 rows on this page have no evidence card: they were found after the match or restored from archive copies, and their outcome and price are shown in the row itself.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.

  1. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We think that Under 2.5 is crying out to be backed based on the available stats and the odds of 1.60 look value.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  2. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We’ll back Newell's Old Boys to beat Platense on the Asian Handicap, with odds of 1.80 on offer that they triumph with a +0.5 goal advantage.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  3. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “we can back Atlético Tucumán at 0.0 against Aldosivi. Odds of 1.66 can be wagered with confidence”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  4. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Back the home team at 1.96 with a +0.25 goal start”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  5. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “If you agree with our verdict that Lanús or Estudiantes La Plata will blank, then you can secure a value 1.61 when it comes to BTTS No.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  6. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “we’ll collect a return at Asian Handicap odds of 1.79 if the away team can win or draw the game.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  7. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “There are several reasons to back Instituto on the Full-Time Result betting market, especially at value odds of 1.89.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  8. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “we can back the home team at 1.71 with a +0.25 goal start on the Asian Handicap.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  9. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “wagering Botafogo +0.25 at 1.91 against Mirassol”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  10. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “side with Coritiba +1 at odds of 1.83”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  11. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “There’s plenty of value in the 1.82 that the visitors get over the line”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  12. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “backing Vitória +0.25 at 1.70 against Cruzeiro”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  13. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “back them at 1.89 on the Full-Time Result market”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  14. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “wagering Bragantino +1.25 at 1.98 on the Asian Handicap”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  15. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “The odds of 1.75 look too good to pass up when it comes to both Athletico Paranaense and Bahia scoring here.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  16. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “take them at 2.00 with a +0.25 goal headstart on the Asian Handicap”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  17. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “There’s an opportunity to back Under 2.5 on the Total Goals market at odds of 1.65.”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    There’s an opportunity to back Under 2.5 on the Total Goals market at odds of 1.65.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Found after the match; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before we first recorded it: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    seen too late

    Corrected . The line was “Over/Under −2.5 goals · under −2.5”; it is now “Over/Under 2.5 goals · under 2.5”. Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and the outcome is worked out on it. This pick was never executed, so no number changes. Corrections log

  18. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “considering they are 1.88 to record a victory over Internacional”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

  19. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “back the 1.66 on the Under 2.5 selection when it comes to Total Goals”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source · Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    back the 1.66 on the Under 2.5 selection when it comes to Total Goals
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Found after the match; date as stated by the source
    Correction
    Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and
    Published
    not stated by the source
    Source page dated
    First recorded by us
    Date note
    The source page is dated long before we first recorded it: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    seen too late

    Corrected . The line was “Over/Under −2.5 goals · under −2.5”; it is now “Over/Under 2.5 goals · under 2.5”. Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and the outcome is worked out on it. This pick was never executed, so no number changes. Corrections log

  20. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We will therefore back them at 1.71 on the Full-Time Result market”

    26 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us