Forecast Record Tips today

SportsGambler: football prediction record

SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 20 of 107

Page 20 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 361–380 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 20 of 107

Showing 361–380 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

11 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.

  1. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We think this is the pick of the player props, with a generous 3.10 available when it comes to backing him to score at any time.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  2. Real Salt Lake v New England Revolution Excluded

    Said: Correct score: Real Salt Lake 1-2 New England Revolution at 7.5 · final score 3-0

    27 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    There’s plenty of juice to be found by backing New England to win 2-1. We can’t pass up the odds of 7.50 when it comes to correct score betting and it’s a fun wager.
    Author said
    Correct score: Real Salt Lake 1-2 New England Revolution at 7.5
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Real Salt Lake 3-0 New England Revolution.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Real Salt Lake — New England Revolution, , final score 3-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 7.50 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  3. Real Salt Lake v New England Revolution Excluded

    Said: Player shots on target over/under 0.5: Matt Polster over 0.5 shots on target at 3.3 · final score 3-0

    27 September 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Matt Polster (New England) can be wagered at 3.30 to record a minimum of one shot on goal. We’ll have a play when it comes to this Shots on Target selection as the betting odds look appealing.
    Author said
    Player shots on target over/under 0.5: Matt Polster over 0.5 shots on target at 3.3
    Outcome of the pick
    Pending: the result data received so far does not include the player shot counts this market needs.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Real Salt Lake — New England Revolution, , final score 3-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 3.30 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  4. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “take San Jose to triumph”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  5. Said: Over/Under 3.5 corners: over 3.5 at 1.73 · final score 3-1

    27 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’re expecting history to repeat itself and for the Portland Team Corners line to get covered at 1.73.
    Author said
    Over/Under 3.5 corners: over 3.5 at 1.73
    Outcome of the pick
    Won — corners 5-9 in the match (14 in total); the final score was San Jose Earthquakes 3-1 Portland Timbers.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    San Jose Earthquakes — Portland Timbers, , final score 3-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.73 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  6. Said: 1X2, match result: San Jose Earthquakes at 2.02 · final score 3-1

    27 September 2026 · Author's odds 2.02 · settled at our market price 1.98: +98 points · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    San Jose To Win @ 2.02
    Author said
    1X2, match result: San Jose Earthquakes at 2.02
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was San Jose Earthquakes 3-1 Portland Timbers.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    recognised
    Event
    San Jose Earthquakes — Portland Timbers, , final score 3-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.02 · independent odds snapshot 1.98 · closing — (snapshot taken ; from a commercial odds aggregator; closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    At the author's stated price1X2, match result — San Jose Earthquakes2.02100.00Won102.00v2.2
    At an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — San Jose Earthquakes1.98100.00Won98.00v2.2

    Corrected . The value was “26 September 2026”; it is now “25 September 2026”. The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  7. Said: Correct score: San Jose Earthquakes 3-1 Portland Timbers at 10 · final score 3-1

    27 September 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on : The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source.

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    A 3-1 win in favor of San Jose is available at odds of 10.00.
    Author said
    Correct score: San Jose Earthquakes 3-1 Portland Timbers at 10
    Outcome of the pick
    Matched: the final score was San Jose Earthquakes 3-1 Portland Timbers.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Correction
    Corrected on : The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source.
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    San Jose Earthquakes — Portland Timbers, , final score 3-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 10.00 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The price and series was “odds snapshot 1.96, stake and series “market price” of the separate Forecast Record reconstruction “San Jose Earthquakes” (a match-result bet derived from the predicted score) shown as if they belonged to the prediction”; it is now “shown only in the row of that simulation; the prediction itself: won (predicted 3-1, final score 3-1)”. The card of this pick took its price, stake and series from the separate Forecast Record reconstruction “San Jose Earthquakes” (a match-result bet derived from the predicted score), not from the prediction itself. The prediction, its own outcome and each calculation are now shown separately; the simulation keeps its own result. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “26 September 2026”; it is now “25 September 2026”. The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source. Corrections log

  8. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “When it comes to him finding the net, we believe the 3.50 available is appealing when backing him on the Anytime Goalscorer market.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  9. Said: Player shots on target over/under 0.5: Cole Bassett over 0.5 shots on target at 2.15 · final score 3-1

    27 September 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Cole Bassett (Portland) is available to have a minimum of one shot on goal at 2.15.
    Author said
    Player shots on target over/under 0.5: Cole Bassett over 0.5 shots on target at 2.15
    Outcome of the pick
    Pending: the result data received so far does not include the player shot counts this market needs.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    San Jose Earthquakes — Portland Timbers, , final score 3-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 2.15 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  10. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Let’s take a chance on the 8.50 available that Vancouver secure a 1-0 victory.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  11. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Both Team To Score No 2.12”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  12. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Let’s stick with this betting trend and back the sides to go under the Total Corners line at odds of 1.71.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  13. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “United Asian Hcp +1.75 @ 1.92”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  14. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “We think this is the pick of the player props, with a generous 1.75 available when it comes to backing him to score at any time.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  15. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Louis Munteanu (United) can be wagered at 1.97 to register a minimum of one shot on goal.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  16. Said: Over/Under 4.5 corners: over 4.5 at 1.77 · final score 3-2

    27 September 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    The latest stats suggest that it’s worth backing Galaxy to cover the Team Corners line, with 1.77 available.
    Author said
    Over/Under 4.5 corners: over 4.5 at 1.77
    Outcome of the pick
    Won — corners 5-6 in the match (11 in total); the final score was LA Galaxy 3-2 Colorado Rapids.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    LA Galaxy — Colorado Rapids, , final score 3-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.77 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  17. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Morgan Whittaker (Colorado) can be backed at 1.65 to have a minimum of one shot on goal. We’ll have a play when it comes to this Shots on Target selection as the betting odds look appealing.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  18. Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Colorado Rapids +0.25 at 1.85 · final score 3-2

    27 September 2026 · settled at the author's odds 1.85: −100 points · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Colorado Asian Hcp +0.25 @ 1.85
    Author said
    Asian handicap 0.25: Colorado Rapids +0.25 at 1.85
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was LA Galaxy 3-2 Colorado Rapids.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    recognised
    Event
    LA Galaxy — Colorado Rapids, , final score 3-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.85 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    At the author's stated priceAsian handicap 0.25 — Colorado Rapids +0.251.85100.00Lost−100.00v2.2

    Corrected . The value was “26 September 2026”; it is now “25 September 2026”. The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

  19. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Based on the stats, we think that odds of 4.50 are really appealing when it comes to betting on Anytime Goalscorer.”

    25 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  20. Said: Correct score: LA Galaxy 1-2 Colorado Rapids at 8 · final score 3-2

    27 September 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off · Corrected on

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    We’re taking a chance on Colorado to achieve a 2-1 winning scoreline. Odds of 8.00 means we can place a smaller stake and still achieve a nice return.
    Author said
    Correct score: LA Galaxy 1-2 Colorado Rapids at 8
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was LA Galaxy 3-2 Colorado Rapids.
    Source
    sportsgambler.com (website)
    Attribution
    unsigned editorial line
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Correction
    Corrected on
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    LA Galaxy — Colorado Rapids, , final score 3-2
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 8.00 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))

    Corrected . The value was “26 September 2026”; it is now “25 September 2026”. The summary dated the prediction by the day Forecast Record first recorded it; it now uses the publication date given by the source. Corrections log

    Corrected . The value was “market or line outside the markets we price”; it is now “the statement had not passed our independent check when the bet was due”. The card gave the wrong reason for the missing bet. The market of this pick is one we settle; the bet was not placed because the statement had not yet passed our independent check. No bet, stake or balance changes. Corrections log

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us