SportsGambler: football prediction record
SportsGambler (football) — football predictions, page 100 of 107
Page 100 of 107 of the predictions by SportsGambler (football) recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 1,961–1,980 of 2,108 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 100 of 107
Showing 1961–1980 of 2,108 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,108 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- Everton v Chelsea Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Everton +0.25 at 1.9 · final score 0-2
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
The way forward could be to back Everton with a +0.25 Asian Handicap at 1.90 against Chelsea. This means our stake is split between 0 and +0.5, which allows us to land a return with a draw.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.25: Everton +0.25 at 1.9
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Everton 0-2 Chelsea.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Everton — Chelsea, , final score 0-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.90 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Brentford v Liverpool Excluded
Said: Draw no bet: Brentford at 1.7 · final score 1-2
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
The Asian Handicap selection of Brentford 0.0 means that there is money back if the game ends level. We can get odds of 1.70 that the Bees manage to beat Liverpool and we’re confident with this bet.
- Author said
- Draw no bet: Brentford at 1.7
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Brentford 1-2 Liverpool.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Brentford — Liverpool, , final score 1-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.70 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Fulham v Hull City Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.75: Hull City +0.75 at 1.88 · final score 1-0
17 October 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We’ll go for the underdogs Hull at +0.75 for their clash against bottom-of-the-table Fulham. Taking the Asian Handicap odds of 1.88 means that the stake is divided between +0.5 and +1 which looks like the best play.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.75: Hull City +0.75 at 1.88
- Outcome of the pick
- Half lost: the final score was Fulham 1-0 Hull City.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Fulham — Hull City, , final score 1-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.88 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Manchester City v Ipswich Town Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.74 · final score 3-2
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Take a chance that both Manchester City and Ipswich will be able to score, especially when you consider the attractive 1.74 that’s been chalked up. We think the BTTS Yes outcome has a good chance of happening.
- Author said
- Both teams to score: yes at 1.74
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Manchester City 3-2 Ipswich Town.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Manchester City — Ipswich Town, , final score 3-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.74 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Borussia M'gladbach v TSG Hoffenheim Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.5: Borussia M'gladbach +0.5 at 1.78 · final score 1-2
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We can get the draw on our side when betting Borussia Monchengladbach +0.5 at Asian Handicap odds of 1.78.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.5: Borussia M'gladbach +0.5 at 1.78
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Borussia M'gladbach 1-2 TSG Hoffenheim.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Borussia M'gladbach — TSG Hoffenheim, , final score 1-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.78 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Bayer 04 Leverkusen v SC Freiburg Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Bayer 04 Leverkusen at 1.68 · final score 2-1
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
we’ll back them with confidence against Freiburg. The odds of 1.68 look attractive when it comes to the home team.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Bayer 04 Leverkusen at 1.68
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-1 SC Freiburg.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Bayer 04 Leverkusen — SC Freiburg, , final score 2-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.68 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Nottingham Forest v Arsenal Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.86 · final score 0-1
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Nottingham Forest and Arsenal could fall short of the three-goal mark and that leads us to back Under 2.5 on the Total Goals market. We’ll gladly snap up the 1.86 when it comes to a low-scoring contest.
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.86
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Nottingham Forest 0-1 Arsenal.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Nottingham Forest — Arsenal, , final score 0-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.86 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Said: European handicap −1: Brighton & Hove Albion −1 at 1.83 · final score 5-0
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
There’s a case for backing Brighton -1 at odds of 1.83, meaning money back if they beat Crystal Palace by a single goal. A victory by two goals or more would land a nice return with this Asian Handicap wager.
- Author said
- European handicap −1: Brighton & Hove Albion −1 at 1.83
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Brighton & Hove Albion 5-0 Crystal Palace.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Brighton & Hove Albion — Crystal Palace, , final score 5-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- AFC Bournemouth v Sunderland Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.67 · final score 2-0
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
The best betting angle for this Bournemouth vs Sunderland fixture could be the BTTS Yes option, especially as it’s attractively priced at 1.67. We can see the two teams both finding the net.
- Author said
- Both teams to score: yes at 1.67
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was AFC Bournemouth 2-0 Sunderland.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- AFC Bournemouth — Sunderland, , final score 2-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.67 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Leeds United v Manchester United Excluded
Said: Draw no bet: Leeds United at 1.66 · final score 1-1
18 October 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We think Leeds are a good bet at 0.0 on the Asian Handicap when they play Manchester United. This selection makes appeal at odds of 1.66, with money back if the contest ends in a draw.
- Author said
- Draw no bet: Leeds United at 1.66
- Outcome of the pick
- Void: the final score was Leeds United 1-1 Manchester United.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Leeds United — Manchester United, , final score 1-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.66 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Said: Asian handicap −1: Brighton & Hove Albion −1 at 1.83 · final score 5-0
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
There’s a case for backing Brighton -1 at odds of 1.83, meaning money back if they beat Crystal Palace by a single goal. A victory by two goals or more would land a nice return with this Asian Handicap wager.
- Author said
- Asian handicap −1: Brighton & Hove Albion −1 at 1.83
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Brighton & Hove Albion 5-0 Crystal Palace.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Brighton & Hove Albion — Crystal Palace, , final score 5-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Udinese v Lecce Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Udinese at 1.82 · final score 0-3
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We’re confident in the chances of Udinese when they clash with Lecce, with our selection appealing on the Full-Time Result market. Take the odds of 1.82 that I Bianconeri claim a victory.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Udinese at 1.82
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Udinese 0-3 Lecce.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Udinese — Lecce, , final score 0-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.82 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- AC Milan v Atalanta Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: AC Milan at 1.77 · final score 3-2
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
AC Milan look like a spot of value at 1.77 when it comes to the Full-Time Result market. I Rossoneri should be able to deliver a victory against Atalanta based on the information available.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: AC Milan at 1.77
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was AC Milan 3-2 Atalanta.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- AC Milan — Atalanta, , final score 3-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.77 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Fiorentina v Como Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Como at 2.06 · final score 1-3
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
If you concur with our view that Como will have the upper hand when meeting Fiorentina, then you can wager the away team at 2.06. We’re anticipating a return with this Full-Time Result pick.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Como at 2.06
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Fiorentina 1-3 Como.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Fiorentina — Como, , final score 1-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 2.06 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Juventus v Lazio Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.83 · final score 0-3
18 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
We’re not anticipating that the net will be found too many times, with Under 2.5 Goals expected when Juventus and Lazio lock horns. This Total Goals prediction affords us attractive betting odds of 1.83.
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.83
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Juventus 0-3 Lazio.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Juventus — Lazio, , final score 0-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.83 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Bristol City v Sheffield United Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Sheffield United +0.25 at 1.9 · final score 0-1
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
when wagering Sheffield United +0.25 at 1.90 against Bristol City.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.25: Sheffield United +0.25 at 1.9
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Bristol City 0-1 Sheffield United.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Bristol City — Sheffield United, , final score 0-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.90 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Derby County v Stoke City Excluded
Said: Asian handicap 0.25: Stoke City +0.25 at 1.64 · final score 0-1
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
If you agree with our view that Stoke can perform well against Derby, then you can bet them with a +0.25 goal start at 1.64.
- Author said
- Asian handicap 0.25: Stoke City +0.25 at 1.64
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Derby County 0-1 Stoke City.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Derby County — Stoke City, , final score 0-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.64 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Wrexham v Preston North End Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Wrexham at 1.68 · final score 4-1
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
considering they are 1.68 to record a victory over Preston.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Wrexham at 1.68
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Wrexham 4-1 Preston North End.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Wrexham — Preston North End, , final score 4-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.68 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.82 · final score 3-2
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Secure a price of 1.82 for Under 2.5 Goals.
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.82
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was West Bromwich Albion 3-2 Blackburn Rovers.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- West Bromwich Albion — Blackburn Rovers, , final score 3-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.82 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Said: 1X2, match result: Birmingham City at 2 · final score 3-0
17 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Birmingham look like the bet to place on the Full-Time Result market, especially as odds of 2.00 are available.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Birmingham City at 2
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Birmingham City 3-0 Queens Park Rangers.
- Source
- sportsgambler.com (website)
- Attribution
- unsigned editorial line
- Origin
- Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
- Published
- not stated by the source
- Source page dated
- First recorded by us
- Date note
- The source page is dated long before this match: it is a page that is updated over time, so the page date is set aside for this prediction.
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Birmingham City — Queens Park Rangers, , final score 3-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 2.00 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us