Forecast Record recorded 10 settled live picks by LMGuerra before kick-off across 6 matches between 10 and . Won 2 of 8 non-void picks at our recorded market prices.
Tracking level: Probation — day 21 of 30 needed for Tracked · 15 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work
Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules
Forecast Record recorded 10 settled live picks by LMGuerra before kick-off across 6 matches between 10 and 30 October 2026. Won 2 of 8 non-void picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 24 predictions we hold for LMGuerra, 17 are linked to matches: 17 were recorded by us before kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.
https://forecastrecord.com/authors/lmguerra/
46 statements read → 24 predictions → 17 linked to matches → 17 recorded before kick-off → 15 outcome-checked → 10 at our recorded market price · none found after kick-off
On 12 picks with a stated price, the author's price was above our market price on 3 (25.0% Small sample (12)), within 5.0% on 9; median difference 0.0% Small sample (12).
Measured: settled by us from the final score · Stated: the author’s own claim, shown as published.
1X2: Real Betis2.13Recorded 36.8 h before kick-offPending
la victoria del Betis a 2.13 en la casa de apuestas DAZNbet me parece uno de los pronósticos más interesantes de este fin de semana en la Primera División española.
Asian handicap -2: Villarreal -2.03.05 market priceRecorded 39.5 h before kick-offLost
Si queremos arriesgar más, podemos jugar un hándicap asiático -2 a favor del Villarreal. Con esta apuesta, si el Villarreal gana por dos goles nos devuelven el dinero, pero si gana por tres o más, ganamos la apuesta, que se paga a una cuota de 3.00.
Asian handicap -1.25: Villarreal -1.251.90 market priceRecorded 39.5 h before kick-offLost
Como pronóstico recomendado, me voy al hándicap asiático -1.25 a favor del Villarreal a cuota 1.90 en Casino Barcelona Apuestas o incluso algo mejor en algunas casas de apuestas.
Match result and both teams to score: Rayo Vallecano win, both teams to score: no3.75 market priceRecorded 66.6 h before kick-offLost
Si queremos subir el nivel de dificultad de nuestra apuesta, podemos apostar por la victoria del Rayo y que ambos equipos no marcan. Esta opción nos la pagan a 4.00
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the returnno market price · not in the headline series
También pueden ser muy interesantes las apuestas que combinen la victoria local con pocos goles, como la victoria del Athletic y menos de 2.5 golesbetbrothers.es
LMGuerra on Forecast Record: 2 won of 10 settled pre-match picks (avg odds 2.96, small sample, 10–30 October 2026). Every pick recorded before kick-off: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/lmguerra/
Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)
Last change · Price rule: independent odds snapshot · Sample: 10 settled live picks, 6 matches · View changes to this record
To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.
<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/lmguerra/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 9 October 2026 · 24 predictions · last change 7 November 2026</a>
Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence
Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.
By market: Asian handicap 1 of 3 (1 W / 2 L, average odds 2.48) Small sample (3); Result and both teams to score 0 of 3 (0 W / 3 L, average odds 4.42) Small sample (3); Match result 1 of 1 (1 W / 0 L, average odds 2.30) Small sample (1).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own. 3 picks left out: void, or half won or half lost on a quarter-goal line.
Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
Price
Same picks
Period
At that price
Return at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price
10
10–30 October 2026
−219 points
−243.09 points
Closing price
4
10–19 October 2026
+160 points
+306.91 points
An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.
What kind of number is this?
Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: nothing on this page.
How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.
Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared with
Picks
>5.0% above
>5.0% below
Within
Median
Our market price when we first recorded the pick
12
3 (25.0%)
0
9
0.0%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 9 of 12 within 5.0% · 3 of 12 more than 5.0% aboveEach bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.
Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way.
Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.
Statements that are not predictions: 8 opinions and 14 not about a match.
How this return was calculated
Every settled pick in “Recorded before kick-off, at our recorded market price” is a stake of 100 points at our recorded market price, a pre-match snapshot of the same selection. The net result (−243.09 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 10 settled live picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (800 points), void picks excluded (2 void). Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.
Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.
Separate comparison window — last 90 days: −243.09 points on 10 live picks settled in this window · 6 matches · 10–30 October 2026 (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted
Changes to this record
Earlier figures stay here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.
New results ·
Before
−43.09 points on 8 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−243.09 points on 10 settled picks across 6 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
2 new settled picks from matches played after the previous record update.
Coverage extended ·
Before
−59.09 points on 5 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−43.09 points on 8 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 3 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
Coverage extended ·
Before
−9.09 points on 4 settled picks across 4 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−59.09 points on 5 settled picks across 5 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
Coverage extended ·
Before
−9.09 points on 3 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−9.09 points on 4 settled picks across 4 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
Data corrected ·
Before
−9.09 points on 4 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−9.09 points on 3 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Data corrected: 1 pick left the headline sample.
Coverage extended ·
Before
−100.00 points on 3 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−9.09 points on 4 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
Coverage extended ·
Before
no return on 2 settled picks across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−100.00 points on 3 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
New results ·
Before
no published headline number
After
no return on 2 settled picks across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
First headline number for this record: 2 settled picks in the series “independent odds snapshot”.
Who this is
Last recorded by us
, the date of this page's data
Observed
—
Channels
website
Statements other than predictions (22 shown)
“Las apuestas deportivas colocan como favoritos a los visitantes, algo que parece totalmente lógico” — · source
“Me deja muchas dudas este movimiento, ya que considero que el estilo de Sarabia necesita tiempo” — · source
“creo que este partido puede llegar a condicionar al Feyenoord este miércoles.” — · source
“Las casas de apuestas se han volcado a favor del equipo español.” — · source
“es muy posible que el equipo local pueda llegar a conformarse con un punto, algo que puede jugar en” — · source
“espero un partido mucho más disputado e igualado de lo que marcan las casas de apuestas” — · source
“Estoy seguro de que aportará serenidad y tranquilidad a un Valencia que tiene mejor plantilla de lo que sus resultados muestran.” — · source
“Las apuestas colocan al Athletic ligeramente favorito y yo discrepo con el mercado.” — · source
La pasada jornada, Lemar cayó lesionado en la derrota por 0-1 ante el Valencia y estará unas semanas