Andrew Beasley: football tipster record — archive reconstruction
Forecast Record restored 3 settled archived picks by Andrew Beasley from copies archived before kick-off, across 2 matches between 16 February and . Reconstructed at archived prices: won 2 of 3 settled archived picks.
How tracking levels work
Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules
Record summary
2 won / 1 lost; average odds 2.09
Small sample (3) · 3 settled picks · picks settled under reconstruction method 1.1
Eligible prices were available for 3 of the 3 selections checked against the result.
Copy citation
Forecast Record restored 3 settled archived picks by Andrew Beasley from copies archived before kick-off, across 2 matches between 16 February and 13 April 2025. Reconstructed at archived prices: won 2 of 3 settled archived picks. Of the 37 predictions we hold for Andrew Beasley, 15 were archived before kick-off by an independent web archive and 22 first found after kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.
Forecast Record restored 3 settled archived picks by Andrew Beasley from copies archived before kick-off, across 2 matches between 16 February and 13 April 2025. Reconstructed at archived prices: won 2 of 3 settled archived picks. Of the 37 predictions we hold for Andrew Beasley, 15 were archived before kick-off by an independent web archive and 22 first found after the match. Figures as of .
https://forecastrecord.com/authors/andrew-beasley/
90 statements read → 37 predictions → 37 linked to matches → 0 recorded before kick-off → 0 outcome-checked → 0 at our recorded market price (+6 at other prices) · 22 found after kick-off (not in the return)
15 archived before kick-off → 3 outcome-checked → 3 at archived prices. Archive and live records are separate.

Latest outcomes
By market and competition
Markets
| Market | Won | Return | Avg odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both teams to score | 1 W / 0 L | — Small sample (1) | 1.85 |
| European handicap | 0 W / 1 L | — Small sample (1) | 1.62 |
| Result and both teams to score | 1 W / 0 L | — Small sample (1) | 2.80 |
Competitions
| Competition | Won | Return | Avg odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier League | 2 W / 1 L | — Small sample (3) | 2.09 |
Recorded picks and results
Liverpool 2-1 West Ham United ·
Match result and both teams to score: Liverpool win, both teams to score: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Liverpool to win & both teams to scoreweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 2.80
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.1
AFC Bournemouth 1-2 Brentford ·
Corner handicap -2: AFC Bournemouth -2without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Bournemouth to have most corners -2web.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.68
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.1
AFC Bournemouth 1-2 Brentford ·
1X2: AFC Bournemouthwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Bournemouth to winweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.74
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.0
Over/Under 11.5 corners: over 11.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Over 11.5 cornersweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 2.10
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.1
1X2: Brentfordwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
Brentford to winweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 2.12
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.0
Newcastle United 4-3 Nottingham Forest ·
Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Over 2.5 goalsweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.59
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.0
Newcastle United 4-3 Nottingham Forest ·
1X2: Newcastle Unitedwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
Newcastle to winweb.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.89
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.0
Liverpool 2-1 Wolverhampton Wanderers ·
BTTS: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Won
head to the Both Teams to Score market and pick yes.web.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.85
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.1
Liverpool 2-1 Wolverhampton Wanderers ·
European handicap -1: Liverpool -1without a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Lost
an Alternative Handicap bet on Liverpool -1 looks like free money.web.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 1.62
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- vretro-1.1
Liverpool v Wolverhampton Wanderers ·
Match result and both teams to score: Liverpool win, both teams to score: yeswithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
select Liverpool in the ‘Result & Both to Score’ market, as that is another very valid option.web.archive.org
- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing 2.55
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Rule
- v2.2
- Why excluded
- This prediction allows two readings; the return excludes it.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Leeds/Draw Double Chance- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- Settlement rule
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
It’s Wolves who look most at risk.- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- Settlement rule
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Chelsea is the pick, as much thanks to the flaws of others as their strengths.- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- Settlement rule
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Bournemouth appeal in the ‘Top Half Finish’ market though.- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- Settlement rule
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Arsenal -1web.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
#WhatoddsPaddy – Jarrod Bowen Score in First Half & Liverpool Winweb.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
#WhatoddsPaddy – Luis Diaz to score first; Liverpool to score 3+ goals & 11+ cornersweb.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Edson Alvarez to be bookedweb.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
Luis Diaz to scoreweb.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the return
#WhatOddsPaddy – Bournemouth to Win, Bournemouth Most Shots On Target & Bournemouth Most Cornersweb.archive.org- Tipster / Source
- Andrew Beasley
- Prices
- Stated —, market —, closing —
- Published
- Recorded
- Kick-off
- Not stated
- Rule
- v2.2
- Why excluded
- This prediction format is not supported.
About this record
Is this you? Reply or claim · 0 corrections
Share this record
Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)
Last change · Reconstruction method 1.1 · Price rule: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Sample: 3 settled archived picks, 2 matches · View changes to this record
Data changes. Added later: 2 records added on Found after kick-off; 3 records added on from archived copies; 20 records added on Found after kick-off; 1 more record added on other dates. The current numbers include them; numbers published earlier, including the record before each match, do not change.
Most of this history was found after the matches. Of the 9 selections in this historical price series, 3 have a pre-match archive copy and 6 were first Found after kick-off.
Reconstructed at archived prices: these picks were restored from copies of the author’s pages that an independent web archive saved before kick-off, at the last pre-match archive prices, bookmaker margin included.
Where Andrew Beasley publishes
Published under this name on news.paddypower.com.
| Platform | Byline | Predictions | Settled picks | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paddy Power News | Andrew Beasley | 37 | 3 | — |
Record card
To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.
<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/andrew-beasley/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 29 September 2026 · 37 predictions · last change 30 September 2026</a>Archived before kick-off · 3 settled archived picks · won 2 of 3
Restored from a copy saved by an independent web archive before kick-off.
15 predictions; 3 checked against the final score.
3 settled selections across 2 matches, 16 February – .
Reconstructed at archived prices: +165.50 points.
Eligible prices were available for 3 of the 3 selections checked against the result.
Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.
Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.
Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices
Won 2 of 3 decided picks; the prices of the same picks implied 50.5%.
By market: Both teams to score 1 of 1 (prices implied 53.9%); European handicap 0 of 1 (prices implied 61.7%); Result and both teams to score 1 of 1 (prices implied 35.7%).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.
Found after kick-off · 6 settled after-match picks · won 2 of 6
First Found after kick-off; the date is the one the source states.
22 predictions; 6 checked against the final score.
6 settled selections across 3 matches, 23 February – .
Reconstructed at archived prices: −250.50 points.
Eligible prices were available for 6 of the 6 selections checked against the result.
Prices are the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off), bookmaker margin included.
Outcome accuracy vs implied by prices
Won 2 of 6 decided picks; the prices of the same picks implied 54.4%.
By market: Match result 1 of 3 (prices implied 52.0%); Corner handicap 0 of 1 (prices implied 59.7%); Corners over/under 0 of 1 (prices implied 47.7%); Over/under goals 1 of 1 (prices implied 63.1%).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.
| Price | Same picks | Period | At that price | Reconstructed at archived prices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closing price, aggregator | 4 | 23 February – | −52 points | −50.50 points |
An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.
What kind of number is this?
- Measured
- Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; the time of each pre-match web-archive copy.
- Stated
- The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
- Calculated
- Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
- Unknown
- Not established from the evidence available. Here: the market price at the moment a restored pick was published.
What this record covers
We monitor the sources listed below. This is not a complete record of everything Andrew Beasley has published.
- Source we monitor
- news.paddypower.com
- Channels
- website
- Watched by us
- 29–30 September 2026
- Earlier entries
- restored from archives, back to
Author's response
No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.
Coverage and exclusions
One set of records: the author’s statements. Each count is a part of the one above it. What each word means · What coverage says.
- Statements
- 90
- Predictions
- 37
- Qualifying picks
- 10
- Settled picks
- 9
Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.
Statements that are not predictions: 9 opinions and 44 not about a match.
How this return was calculated
Every settled pick in “Archived before kick-off, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off)” is a stake of 100 points at the last pre-match archive price, a reconstruction at archived prices on picks archived before kick-off only. The net result (+165.50 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 3 settled archived picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (300 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.
Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.
Separate comparison window — last 90 days: the return appears from the first settled pick in this window (method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted
Changes to this record
The headline number above is (reconstruction method 1.1, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only). When it changes, the earlier figure stays here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.
Data corrected ·
- Before
- +320.50 points on 4 settled picks across 2 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1
- After
- +165.50 points on 3 settled picks across 2 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1
Data corrected: 1 pick left the headline sample.
Method changed ·
- Before
- +270.00 points on 8 settled picks across 5 matches · second data provider's closing price, restored · Reconstruction method 1.1
- After
- +320.50 points on 4 settled picks across 2 matches · reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only · Reconstruction method 1.1
The headline rule changed on : the headline is the live record at our recorded market price; without one, reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off) on picks archived before kick-off only. Picks first Found after kick-off no longer enter the headline number. Was: second data provider's closing price, restored (8 settled picks). Now: reconstructed at archived prices (~8–15 h before kick-off), archived before kick-off only (4 settled picks).
Pre-match close: the last market price for the same selection before kick-off. Definition.
Who this is
- Last recorded by us
- , 38 days before this page's data date
- Observed
- —
- Channels
- website
Statements other than predictions (47 shown)
- “Maybe this match ends, oh, I don’t know, 2-7?” — · source
- “Presumably, the winner will play Brighton for the crown.” — · source
- “Oh, and if you’re interested, I think Leeds could stay up at their expense, but there’s no market for that.” — · source
- “Does anyone else look certain? It’s a stretch to imagine Tottenham and United making it based on last season, to be honest.” — · source
- “As for Villa, do you think Unai Emery is going to pass up the chance to win the Europa League for the 14th time? Me neither.” — · source
- “If you think the former can get into the top four, send me the money and leave Paddy out of it.” — · source
- “On the data from last season, you’d back them. But, with Alexander Isak overshadowing their summer, and a thin squad playing Champions League football, it makes sense to steer clear.” — · source
- “City are going to be fascinating. While they finished third last term, the underlying numbers suggested they were far worse. Their journey back to the top is further than the 24/25 table implies. And will wildcard Rayan Cherki prove an inspired signing or burn Pep Guardiola’s brain out?” — · source
- “Can Arsenal or Man City, the second and third favourites, stop them?” — · source
Paddy’s Super Sub totaliser: Almost 100,000 EPL bets win from our ace offer so far in 2024/25
· Source
Introducing Super Sub 2.0: Now with even more markets including a raft of 2+ and 3+ options!
· Source
An acca with these bets pays at approximately 20/1 with Paddy Power.
· Source
An acca with these bets pays at approximately 36/1 with Paddy Power.
· Source
Introducing Super Sub 2.0: Now with even more markets, including a raft of 2+ and 3+ options!
· Source
With Diogo Jota not fit enough to start and Cody Gakpo possibly injured at Everton
· Source
Slot seems to trust him at Anfield, selecting the number nine for three of the Reds’ previous four home games
· Source
No other player in the Premier League has had this happen on more than nine occasions in 2024/25
· Source
This bet has paid out 12 times this season, including against the Reds at Molineux.
· Source
Three of the last four meetings of these teams featured at least 24, so it isn’t hard to imagine the bet mark being reached.
· Source
They’ve done so in nine of their 12 away matches, for starters.
· Source
You will probably need them to net four times, though, as there’s a fair chance Wolves will score.
· Source
These tips can also be added into a Bet Builder, which pays at approximately 22/1 with Paddy Power.
· Source
TV: Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Premier League
· Source
A Bet Builder with the FIRST FOUR BETS in this list pays at approximately 40/1 with Paddy Power.
· Source
WHEN: Sunday, 20th of April, 2pm WHERE: Portman Road, Ipswich TV: Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports
· Source
A Bet Builder on the above pays at approximately 30/1 with Paddy Power.
· Source
THE PADDY POWER GUIDE TO SAFER GAMBLING – EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
· Source
The latest football odds are on PaddyPower.com now
· Source
Premier League TV Schedule and Channel Guide for 2025/26 season
· Source
When does the next Premier League season start? Key dates for 2025/26 campaign
· Source
Premier League golden boot odds: Who will finish top scorer in 2025/26?
· Source
Who are favourites to be relegated from the Premier League this season?
· Source
They had the worst expected goal difference of any side that stayed up, while only Forest overachieved by more against their attacking xG. If that pings back towards average, they’ll be in big trouble.
· Source
They have lost key players like Bryan Mbeumo, Christian Norgaard, Matheus Cunha, Rayan Ait-Nouri and Mohammed Kudus. The Bees are also without Thomas Frank, who could be the costliest departure in this paragraph.
· Source
Beyond them, Brentford, Wolves and West Ham are the likeliest candidates. You could make a case for any of them based on the changes at each club.
· Source
The promoted teams inevitably lead the relegation market, with Burnley, Leeds and Sunderland all odds-on for the drop.
· Source
While Brighton stand a fair chance of maintaining their top 10 status, there’s better value with Bournemouth.
· Source
Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest will be distracted by Europe. Everton improved under David Moyes, but have a new stadium, which may or may not work for them.
· Source
The Cherries were at least 12th in each of the last two seasons, averaging 52 points when 10th comes in at around 50.
· Source
They finished at least seventh in each of the last three seasons, with 65 points on average across those campaigns. The sixth-placed team averaged 63 in the last decade, so Villa can reach the top six by holding steady.
· Source
They only finished five points adrift of fifth last term, after all.
· Source
Bournemouth would have been third if games were decided on expected goals last season. The fact they finished ninth shows the difficulty in turning performances into wins without superstars, with the loss of Dean Huijsen and Milos Kerkez unlikely to see them improve.
· Source
Brighton, Leicester and West Ham all finished in those places within the last five seasons, as have Everton and Southampton if looking a little further back.
· Source
Their summer exertions may take a toll, plus Enzo Maresca must accommodate the 57 players they’ve bought this summer.
· Source
World Champions (lol), Chelsea are the only other club who are odds-on to take one of the spots.
· Source
But the Reds have recruited well, especially in British transfer record signing Florian Wirtz.
· Source
They must deal with the tragic loss of Diogo Jota, while Trent Alexander-Arnold and Luis Diaz have left for the continent.
· Source
The full list is in the JSON and CSV downloads of this page.
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page. A download includes the full machine list when the page shows a filtered view.
Share cards of this record (2)
Check us
Calculations for the displayed picks
| Prediction | Series | Market and pick | Price | Stake | Result | Points | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC Bournemouth v Brentford Lost | Restored, at the closing market price | 1X2, match result — AFC Bournemouth | 1.74 | 100.00 | Lost | −100.00 | retro-1.0 |
| AFC Bournemouth v Brentford Lost | Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) | 1X2, match result — AFC Bournemouth | 1.75 | 100.00 | Lost | −100.00 | retro-1.1 |
| Brentford v Aston Villa Lost | Restored, at the closing market price | 1X2, match result — Brentford | 2.12 | 100.00 | Lost | −100.00 | retro-1.0 |
| Brentford v Aston Villa Lost | Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) | 1X2, match result — Brentford | 2.15 | 100.00 | Lost | −100.00 | retro-1.1 |
| Newcastle United v Nottingham Forest Won | Restored, at the closing market price | Over/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.5 | 1.59 | 100.00 | Won | 58.65 | retro-1.0 |
| Newcastle United v Nottingham Forest Won | Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) | Over/Under 2.5 goals — over 2.5 | 1.58 | 100.00 | Won | 58.50 | retro-1.1 |
| Newcastle United v Nottingham Forest Won | Restored, at the closing market price | 1X2, match result — Newcastle United | 1.89 | 100.00 | Won | 89.35 | retro-1.0 |
| Newcastle United v Nottingham Forest Won | Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) | 1X2, match result — Newcastle United | 1.91 | 100.00 | Won | 91.00 | retro-1.1 |