Sam Farley: football prediction record
Sam Farley — football predictions, page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 of the predictions by Sam Farley recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 1–20 of 27 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 2 of 3
Showing 1–20 of 27 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 27 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
18 rows on this page have no evidence card: they were found after the match or restored from archive copies, and their outcome and price are shown in the row itself.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Both teams to Score: Yes”
30 August 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “NAP – Andre to commit 2+ fouls”
16 August 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Value Pick – Tijjani Reijnders to score”
16 August 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- Wolverhampton Wanderers v Manchester City Lost
Said: Match result and both teams to score: Manchester City win, both teams to score: yes · final score 0-4
16 August 2025 · settled at the last pre-match archive price 3.23, restored: −100 points · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Man City to win”
20 May 2025 · Archived before kick-off
Archived before kick-off: restored later from a copy that an independent web archive saved before the match started. Definition.
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Wolves win or draw (Double Chance)”
20 May 2025 · Archived before kick-off
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Nottingham Forest to win”
18 May 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Brighton to win”
19 April 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Alexander Isak to score first”
16 April 2025 · Archived before kick-off
- Newcastle United v Crystal Palace Won
Said: 1X2, match result: Newcastle United · final score 5-0
16 April 2025 · settled at the last pre-match archive price 1.66, restored: +66 points · Archived before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Newcastle to win
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Newcastle United
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Newcastle United 5-0 Crystal Palace.
- Source
- news.paddypower.com (website)
- Speaker
- Sam Farley
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Archived before kick-off (archive copy of )
- Added
- Added to our record on 29 Sep 2026
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- seen too late
- Event
- Newcastle United v Crystal Palace, , final score 5-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price — · independent odds snapshot — · closing 1.65
- Count status
- counted in the restored-history series
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method Restored, at the closing market price 1X2, match result — Newcastle United 1.65 100.00 Won 65.36 retro-1.0 Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) 1X2, match result — Newcastle United 1.66 100.00 Won 66.00 retro-1.1 - Newcastle United v Crystal Palace Lost
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 · final score 5-0
16 April 2025 · settled at the last pre-match archive price 2.21, restored: −100 points · Archived before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Under 2.5 goals
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Newcastle United 5-0 Crystal Palace.
- Source
- news.paddypower.com (website)
- Speaker
- Sam Farley
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Archived before kick-off (archive copy of )
- Added
- Added to our record on 29 Sep 2026
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- seen too late
- Event
- Newcastle United v Crystal Palace, , final score 5-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price — · independent odds snapshot — · closing 2.20
- Count status
- counted in the restored-history series
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method Restored, at the closing market price Over/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.5 2.20 100.00 Lost −100.00 retro-1.0 Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) Over/Under 2.5 goals — under 2.5 2.21 100.00 Lost −100.00 retro-1.1 - No match linked Excluded
Said: “Brighton to win both halves”
12 April 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Arsenal to win”
1 April 2025 · Archived before kick-off
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Everton v West Ham – Everton to win”
15 March 2025 · Archived before kick-off
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Both teams to score & over 2.5 goals”
8 March 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Under 2.5 goals”
25 February 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Under 2.5 goals”
22 February 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Alexander Isak to score”
15 February 2025 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Raphinha to score”
11 March 2025 · Archived before kick-off
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Gijs Smal to commit 1 or more foul”
5 March 2025 · Archived before kick-off
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us