Individual tipster · liverpoolecho.co.uk

Richard Garnett: football tipster record

Forecast Record has recorded 37 statements by Richard Garnett, including 4 predictions. Figures as of .

Tracking level: Probation — day 1 of 30 needed for Tracked · 4 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work

Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules

Record summary

Early record: 4 predictions recorded before kick-off, none at an eligible market price

1 score forecast checked against the final score: the score and its implied result were both wrong.

Small sample (1) · Outcome checked

Copy citation

Forecast Record has recorded 37 statements by Richard Garnett, including 4 predictions. Of the 4 predictions we hold for Richard Garnett, 4 were recorded by us before kick-off. The statements are listed below; as of 7 November 2026.

https://forecastrecord.com/authors/richard-garnett/

37 statements read → 4 predictions → 4 linked to matches → 4 recorded before kick-off → 4 outcome-checked → 0 at our recorded market price · none found after kick-off

Measured: settled by us from the final score · Stated: the author’s own claim, shown as published.

Tipster, source and record definitions

Compare football tipsters and sources

Recorded picks and results

1–4 of 4

On this page: 0 settled · 0 pending · 4 excluded from the return

Brentford 1-2 Liverpool ·

Correct score: Brentford 2-2 Liverpoolwithout a stated priceRecorded 12.1 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
Predicting a 2-2 draw in his weekly predictions column
liverpoolecho.co.uk
Tipster / Source
Richard Garnett
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Pick and result
The pick did not match the result
Why excluded
Shown for reference; the return excludes this pick.
Cite · Report

Brentford 1-2 Liverpool ·

Correct score: Brentford 1-1 Liverpoolwithout a stated priceRecorded 12.1 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
And I think all things considered, I think it could be a score draw. 1-1.
liverpoolecho.co.uk
Tipster / Source
Richard Garnett
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Pick and result
The pick did not match the result
Why excluded
More than one reading of this statement is possible.
Cite · Report

Brentford 1-2 Liverpool ·

Correct score: Brentford 2-1 Liverpoolwithout a stated priceRecorded 12.1 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
Oh no, no, I'm sorry mate, I'm going for a Brentford 2-1 victory.
liverpoolecho.co.uk
Tipster / Source
Richard Garnett
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Pick and result
The pick did not match the result
Why excluded
Shown for reference; the return excludes this pick.
Cite · Report

Brentford 1-2 Liverpool ·

1X2: Brentfordwithout a stated priceRecorded 12.1 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
I'm going to go for a home win.
liverpoolecho.co.uk
Tipster / Source
Richard Garnett
Prices
Stated —, market —, closing —
Published
Recorded
Kick-off
Rule
v2.2
Pick and result
The pick did not match the result
Why excluded
Shown for reference; the return excludes this pick.
Cite · Report

About this record

Source tracked for Richard Garnett: liverpoolecho.co.uk, observed since .

Share this record

Richard Garnett on Forecast Record: 4 pre-match predictions recorded (28 September–17 October 2026). Full log: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/richard-garnett/

Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)

Where Richard Garnett publishes

Published under this name on liverpoolecho.co.uk.

Publishing platforms
PlatformBylinePredictionsSettled picksResult
Liverpool EchoRichard Garnett40—

Record card

To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.

<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/richard-garnett/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 17 October 2026 · 4 predictions · last change 17 October 2026</a>

Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence

Recorded before kick-off, graded after the match

4 predictions recorded before kick-off. None of the 4 was right.

Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.

Score forecasts without a betting market price

Outcome checked. No betting return is attributed to this score forecast.

The score forecast did not name the exact score.

The result implied by the named score was wrong. No stated price. The pick passport shows the reconstruction from the predicted score, kept apart from the headline figures.

The implied result follows from the named score (2-1 implies a home win).

What kind of number is this?

Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: a return for this record, until a pick has an eligible price.

The four data statuses

What this record covers

We monitor the sources listed below. This is not a complete record of everything Richard Garnett has published.

Source we monitor
liverpoolecho.co.uk
Channels
website
Watched by us
28 September –

Author's response

No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.

Respond or request a correction

Coverage and exclusions

One set of records: the author’s statements. Each count is a part of the one above it. What each word means · What coverage says.

Statements
37
Predictions
4
Qualifying picks
0
Settled picks
0

Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.

Statements that are not predictions: 16 opinions and 17 not about a match.

How this return was calculated

The return appears here from the first settled pick. What a settled pick is.

Separate comparison window — last 90 days: the return appears from the first settled pick in this window (method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted

Who this is

Last recorded by us
, 21 days before this page's data date
Observed
—
Channels
website

Statements other than predictions (33 shown)

  • “Both sides will be desperate for the win, even if the whole thing is rather meaningless.” — · source
  • “Sunday's match is going ahead regardless, so Liverpool and City fans should enjoy the occasion and make the most of what could be the last time that the two sides face each other for a while.” — · source
  • “But until then, everyone invested in the Premier League is expected to carry on like nothing serious has happened. With each passing year, the game's detachment from the real world never fails to surprise.” — · source
  • “I believe City should have been suspended from the Premier League as soon as the verdict was delivered, subject to appeal, although the league's own handbook explains why that isn't possible in practice.” — · source
  • “It almost renders Sunday's result completely pointless, not that anyone in the stadium will be thinking about that whilst the game is in progress.” — · source
  • “Some people will be paying north of £100 to watch a white elephant football match. Consider that for a moment.” — · source
  • “If City are removed from the top flight, their results for this season will need to be expunged and the outcome of Sunday's game will be null and void.” — · source
  • “Should City fail to win their appeal, they should face immediate consequences, including suspension from the Premier League and possible expulsion.” — · source
  • “Over 60,000 people will turn up for a football match on Sunday that will be broadcast to millions across the globe, but could ultimately be completely pointless.” — · source
  • “And despite the build-up to this huge contest, that is really the only reason that it has any relevance whatsoever.” — · source
  • “I should be excited about going to Liverpool vs Man City but whole thing may be pointless” — · source
  • “"If I'm being honest, it's going to be difficult barring a miracle for both Wirtz and Isak to start” — · source
  • “"With Jurgen Klopp being Germany's manager and Iraola, a very good manager at Liverpool, they'll put” — · source
  • “"I think it's going to be a case where, despite him not being his club manager, Jurgen Klopp will probably” — · source
  • “Working with Jurgen Klopp could hold the key to getting the best out of Florian Wirtz at Liverpool” — · source
  • “Stan Collymore reckons Jurgen Klopp is about to do Liverpool a huge favour” — · source
  • The delivery of the guilty verdict on City's serial financial doping was drawn out over years and no doubt the appeal will be stretched for as long as possible also.

    · Source

  • Instead, Enzo Maresca's side will carry on about their business like nothing has happened, sitting proudly at the top of the table. For how long, is currently anyone's guess.

    · Source

  • City are appealing the damning verdict of the independent panel and remain bullish in their confidence of overturning the outcome.

    · Source

  • But with City currently sitting at the top of the table with a perfect record after five matches, it goes without saying that this will be the toughest examination of this current Liverpool side yet under the former Bournemouth boss.

    · Source

  • What sort of effect this will have on the fortunes of Andoni Iraola's team, which will be without the in-form forwards Alexander Isak and Cody Gakpo, remains to be seen.

    · Source

  • There's little question that the home crowd is going to make the experience a deeply unpleasant one for their disgraced visitors

    · Source

  • With revenues that appear to have been artificially inflated to the tune of around £830m, City are now facing the prospect of brutal sanctions, including possible expulsion from the Premier League.

    · Source

  • It will be City's first match since the club that has won eight Premier League titles and the Champions League in the past 14 years was found guilty by an independent panel of all but one of the serious breaches related to financial wrongdoing it was accused of.

    · Source

  • Sky Sports has unsurprisingly selected it for their prime time 4:30 pm Sunday afternoon kick-off

    · Source

  • The Reds face Man City on Sunday in Enzo Maresca's side's first match since the club was found guilty of serious financial charges

    · Source

  • Ensure our latest news and what's on headlines always appear at the top of your Google search by making

    · Source

  • But he scored a brilliant goal for Klopp's Germany in the Nations League last week against Serbia before

    · Source

  • Wirtz, 23, only made a moderate impact in his first season in the Premier League and has come in for

    · Source

  • According to data specialists OLBG, City could be forced to pay out more than £527m in domestic prize money to their domestic rivals.

    · Source

  • Everton and Liverpool could be in line for a combined £53m payday following the seismic reported verdict on Manchester City's 115 charges of financial breaches.

    · Source

  • The reported bombshell announcement is set to shock football and both Everton and Liverpool stand to make huge financial gains.

    · Source

  • Everton and Liverpool could get huge payday after Man City charges - with Blues earning most

    · Source

The full list is in the JSON and CSV downloads of this page.

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page. A download includes the full machine list when the page shows a filtered view.

Share cards of this record (1)

Check us

Record definitions and related evidence