Jasper van den Boogaard: football prediction record
Jasper van den Boogaard — football predictions, page 47 of 81
Page 47 of 81 of the predictions by Jasper van den Boogaard recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 901–920 of 1,592 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 47 of 81
Showing 901–920 of 1,592 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 1,592 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
10 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page · Current predictions.
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Beste wedtip: meer dan 26.5 schoten @ 1.55.”
29 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- FC Augsburg v SC Freiburg Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: SC Freiburg · final score 1-2
31 October 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off
Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Conclusie SC Freiburg: Freiburg heeft een drukke week achter de rug, maar staat er in de stand goed voor en heeft genoeg kwaliteit om in Augsburg te winnen.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: SC Freiburg
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was FC Augsburg 1-2 SC Freiburg.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- recognised
- Event
- FC Augsburg — SC Freiburg, , final score 1-2
- Bayer 04 Leverkusen v VfB Stuttgart Excluded
Said: Correct score: Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-1 VfB Stuttgart · final score 2-4
31 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 Eindvoorspelling: 2-1 – Leverkusen wint een aanvallende wedstrijd, maar Stuttgart maakt het de thuisploeg niet makkelijk.
- Author said
- Correct score: Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-1 VfB Stuttgart
- Outcome of the pick
- Did not match: the final score was Bayer 04 Leverkusen 2-4 VfB Stuttgart.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- score forecast
- State
- recognised
- Event
- Bayer 04 Leverkusen — VfB Stuttgart, , final score 2-4
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method Forecast Record reconstruction from the predicted score 1X2, match result — Bayer 04 Leverkusen 1.68 100.00 Lost −100.00 v2.2 - No match linked Excluded
Said: “Beste wedtip: meer dan 9.5 schoten op doel @ 1.66.”
29 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Erzurumspor FK v Çorum FK Excluded
Said: Correct score: Erzurumspor FK 1-1 Çorum FK · final score 1-3
31 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 Eindvoorspelling: 1-1 – Een evenwichtig duel waarbij beide ploegen scoren, maar geen van beide genoeg kracht heeft om de drie punten te pakken.
- Author said
- Correct score: Erzurumspor FK 1-1 Çorum FK
- Outcome of the pick
- Did not match: the final score was Erzurumspor FK 1-3 Çorum FK.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- score forecast
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Erzurumspor FK — Çorum FK, , final score 1-3
Said: Team goals over/under 1.5: Erzurumspor FK under 1.5 at 1.5 · final score 1-3
31 October 2026 · Author's odds 1.50 · settled at our market price 1.46: +45.50 points · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Beste wedtip: Erzurumspor FK - Minder dan 1.5 doelpunten @ 1.50.
- Author said
- Team goals over/under 1.5: Erzurumspor FK under 1.5 at 1.5
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Erzurumspor FK 1-3 Çorum FK.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- recognised
- Event
- Erzurumspor FK — Çorum FK, , final score 1-3
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.50 · independent odds snapshot 1.46 · closing — (snapshot taken ; from a commercial odds aggregator; closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method At the author's stated price Team goals over/under 1.5 — Erzurumspor FK under 1.5 1.50 100.00 Won 50.00 v2.2 At an independent odds snapshot Team goals over/under 1.5 — Erzurumspor FK under 1.5 1.46 100.00 Won 45.50 v2.2 - No match linked Excluded
Said: “Erzurumspor 1 - 1 FT Corum FK”
28 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- KV Mechelen v KRC Genk Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: KRC Genk · final score 1-0
31 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 De kansen liggen duidelijk bij Genk: een zege voor de bezoekers wordt genoteerd op 1.91, terwijl een thuiszege of gelijkspel allebei op 3.50 staat. Volgens de rekenmodellen heeft Genk ruim zestig procent kans op de drie punten.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: KRC Genk
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was KV Mechelen 1-0 KRC Genk.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- KV Mechelen — KRC Genk, , final score 1-0
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Beste wedtip: T. Koudou - Meer dan 0.5 schot & Genk of gelijkspel @ 1.60.”
28 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- KV Mechelen v KRC Genk Excluded
Said: Correct score: KV Mechelen 1-2 KRC Genk · final score 1-0
31 October 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 Eindvoorspelling: 1-2 – Genk wint op vreemde bodem en pakt drie belangrijke punten in de strijd om de subtop.
- Author said
- Correct score: KV Mechelen 1-2 KRC Genk
- Outcome of the pick
- Did not match: the final score was KV Mechelen 1-0 KRC Genk.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- score forecast
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- KV Mechelen — KRC Genk, , final score 1-0
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Minder dan 30.5 schoten Tottenham Hotspur – Crystal Palace 1.35”
31 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Standard Liege v KV Kortrijk Excluded
Said: Correct score: Standard Liege 2-0 KV Kortrijk · final score 1-1
31 October 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Eindvoorspelling: 2-0 – Standard wint thuis comfortabel van een Kortrijk zonder doelpunten uit.
- Author said
- Correct score: Standard Liege 2-0 KV Kortrijk
- Outcome of the pick
- Did not match: the final score was Standard Liege 1-1 KV Kortrijk.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- score forecast
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Standard Liege — KV Kortrijk, , final score 1-1
- Standard Liege v KV Kortrijk Excluded
Said: Over/Under 3.5 goals: under 3.5 at 1.47 · final score 1-1
31 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Beste wedtip: minder dan 3.5 doelpunten @ 1.47.
- Author said
- Over/Under 3.5 goals: under 3.5 at 1.47
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Standard Liege 1-1 KV Kortrijk.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Standard Liege — KV Kortrijk, , final score 1-1
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.47 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Standard Liege v KV Kortrijk Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Standard Liege · final score 1-1
31 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 Trend: De onderlinge reeks is volledig in balans, maar de thuisvoordeel en het grote verschil in huidige vorm geven Standard dit keer de overhand.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Standard Liege
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Standard Liege 1-1 KV Kortrijk.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Standard Liege — KV Kortrijk, , final score 1-1
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Beste wedtip: N. Füllkrug - Meer dan 0.5 schot op doel & W. Burger - Meer dan 0.5 schot @ 1.85.”
29 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- SV Werder Bremen v TSG Hoffenheim Excluded
Said: Correct score: SV Werder Bremen 1-2 TSG Hoffenheim · final score 2-0
31 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
👉 Eindvoorspelling: 1-2 – Hoffenheim wint op vreemde bodem dankzij betere vorm en een sterk historisch record in dit duel.
- Author said
- Correct score: SV Werder Bremen 1-2 TSG Hoffenheim
- Outcome of the pick
- Did not match: the final score was SV Werder Bremen 2-0 TSG Hoffenheim.
- Source
- bet-experts.nl (website)
- Speaker
- Jasper van den Boogaard
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- score forecast
- State
- recognised
- Event
- SV Werder Bremen — TSG Hoffenheim, , final score 2-0
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method Forecast Record reconstruction from the predicted score 1X2, match result — TSG Hoffenheim 2.58 100.00 Lost −100.00 v2.2 - No match linked Excluded
Said: “Boston wint: 1,44”
31 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Boston Bruins wint Winnaar, incl. verlenging en shoot-out 1,44”
31 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “De tip: Colorado Avalanche -1,5, odd 1,59”
31 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Onze voorspelling: Boston Bruins – Chicago Blackhawks 4-1”
31 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us