Forecast Record recorded 2 settled live picks by Fønix before kick-off across 2 matches between 21 and . Won 1 of 2 settled live picks at our recorded market prices.
Tracking level: Probation — day 12 of 30 needed for Tracked · 5 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work
Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules
Record summary
1 won / 1 lost; average odds 1.85
Small sample (2) · 2 settled picks · picks settled under method v2.2
Eligible prices were available for 2 of the 5 selections checked against the result.
Forecast Record recorded 2 settled live picks by Fønix before kick-off across 2 matches between 21 and 31 October 2026. Won 1 of 2 settled live picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 19 predictions we hold for Fønix, 5 are linked to matches: 5 were recorded by us before kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.
https://forecastrecord.com/authors/fonix/
80 statements read → 19 predictions → 5 linked to matches → 5 recorded before kick-off → 5 outcome-checked → 2 at our recorded market price · none found after kick-off
On 2 picks with a stated price, the author's price was above our market price on 0 Small sample (2), within 5.0% on 2.
Measured: settled by us from the final score · Stated: the author’s own claim, shown as published.
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the return
Nu tænkte jeg X2 men går med +1.0
Chance (1-X-2) inklusiv handicap
31-26-43%
Betvalue
Bet value viser et væddemåls værdi baseret på spilforslagets chancevurdering. Jo højere bet…betxpert.com
To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.
<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/fonix/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 11 October 2026 · 19 predictions · last change 7 November 2026</a>
Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence
Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.
3 predictions recorded before kick-off. Right in 3 of 3.
Prices implied by market
By market: Match result 1 of 1 (1 W / 0 L, average odds 1.83) Small sample (1); Over/under goals 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L, average odds 1.87) Small sample (1).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.
Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
Price
Same picks
Period
At that price
Return at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price
2
21–31 October 2026
−15 points
−17.36 points
Closing price
2
21–31 October 2026
+20 points
−17.36 points
An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.
What kind of number is this?
Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: nothing on this page.
How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.
Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared with
Picks
>5.0% above
>5.0% below
Within
Median
Our market price when we first recorded the pick
2
0 (0.0%)
0
2
+0.9%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 2 of 2 within 5.0%Each bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.
Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way.
Author's response
No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.
Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.
Statements that are not predictions: 18 opinions and 43 not about a match.
How this return was calculated
Every settled pick in “Recorded before kick-off, at our recorded market price” is a stake of 100 points at our recorded market price, a pre-match snapshot of the same selection. The net result (−17.36 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 2 settled live picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (200 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.
Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.
Separate comparison window — last 90 days: −17.36 points on 2 live picks settled in this window · 2 matches · 21–31 October 2026 (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted
Changes to this record
Earlier figures stay here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.
New results ·
Before
−100.00 points on 1 settled pick across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−17.36 points on 2 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
1 new settled pick from matches played after the previous record update.
New results ·
Before
no published headline number
After
−100.00 points on 1 settled pick across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
First headline number for this record: 1 settled pick in the series “independent odds snapshot”.
Who this is
Last recorded by us
, the date of this page's data
Observed
—
Channels
website
Statements other than predictions (60 shown)
“Man troede lige det kunne blive en rigtig sjov sæson for Leeds efter 5-1-sejren over Newcastle” — · source
“OBS. Hvis startopstillingerne går imod forudsætningerne for spillet så annullerer jeg det” — · source
“Der forventes et meget åbent opgør, med fart i begge ender.” — · source
“Groundhog Day
Lørdagen starter med et retro 00'er topopgør mellem Chelsea og United.” — · source
“kender vi Mourinho ret, så bliver det ud fra en taktik, der primært går ud på at ødelægge Barca's spil.” — · source
“Real er allerede 6 point bagefter, så derfor er det ALTAFGØRENDE at Real ikke taber i Barcelona.” — · source
“Kommer Leipzig tidligt foran kan det have stor betydning for kampbilledet.” — · source
“Oddset er allerede faldet lidt, så værdien kan være høstet” — · source
“Hull finder ekstra gejst på hjemmebane, og de skal jo rejse sig fra Fulham-kampen.” — · source
“Markedet kan have ret i, at de oprindelige chancevurdering var forkert.” — · source
“Arteta proklamerede at Arsenal ville være de "angribende mestrer" fremfor de "forsvarende".” — · source
“Denne sæson er de to skarpe i CL fra en start” — · source
“Barca er ikke for alvor blevet testet i denne sæson endnu.” — · source
“Sammen med Bayern er PSG og Barca Europas bedste offensive hold.” — · source
“Carrick kan have løsningen til at lukke Justin ned.” — · source
“Justin kan nok ikke holde til 90 minutter, hvis han skal vandre over hele banen.” — · source
“OBS. Er der noget i startopstillingen der bryder med forudsætningerne for spillet - og kan jeg få alle pengene retur - så sætter jeg forslaget som void” — · source
“at Glasner - på trods af et overraskende nederlag til Coventry - er ved at få skabt noget interessant” — · source
OBS. Hvis startopstillingerne går imod forudsætningerne for dette spil annullerer jeg det.