Forecast Record recorded 2 settled live picks by Felipe Laos before kick-off across 2 matches on . Won 1 of 2 settled live picks at our recorded market prices.
Tracking level: Probation — day 13 of 30 needed for Tracked · 8 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work
Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules
Record summary
1 won / 1 lost; average odds 1.36
Small sample (2) · 2 settled picks · picks settled under method v2.2
Eligible prices were available for 2 of the 8 selections checked against the result.
Forecast Record recorded 2 settled live picks by Felipe Laos before kick-off across 2 matches on 2 November 2026. Won 1 of 2 settled live picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 49 predictions we hold for Felipe Laos, 15 are linked to matches: 10 were recorded by us before kick-off and 5 first found after kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.
Previously published citation
Forecast Record recorded 2 settled live picks by Felipe Laos before kick-off across 2 matches on 2 November 2026. Won 1 of 2 settled live picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 49 predictions we hold for Felipe Laos, 15 are linked to matches: 10 were recorded by us before kick-off and 5 first found after the match. Figures as of .
Match result and both teams to score: Alianza Atlético de Sullana win, both teams to score: yes2.55Recorded 39.6 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
Ambos equipos anotan y sin empate: Sí
Inkabet
★★★★★
2.55
Felipe Laos on Forecast Record: 10 pre-match predictions recorded (). Full log: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/felipe-laos/
Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)
Last change · Price rule: independent odds snapshot · Sample: 2 settled live picks, 2 matches · View changes to this record
Data changes. Added later: 5 records added on Found after kick-off. The current numbers include them; numbers published earlier, including the record before each match, do not change.
To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.
<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/felipe-laos/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 14 October 2026 · 49 predictions · last change 6 November 2026</a>
Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence
Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.
6 predictions recorded before kick-off. Right in 2 of 6.
Prices implied by market
By market: Asian handicap 1 of 1 (1 W / 0 L, average odds 1.28) Small sample (1); Over/under goals 0 of 1 (0 W / 1 L, average odds 1.44) Small sample (1).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.
Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
Price
Same picks
Period
At that price
Return at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price
2
−30 points
−72 points
An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.
Found after kick-off
First Found after kick-off; the date is the one the source states.
5 predictions; 0 checked against the final score.
What kind of number is this?
Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: the market price at the moment a restored pick was published.
How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.
Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared with
Picks
>5.0% above
>5.0% below
Within
Median
Our market price when we first recorded the pick
3
1 (33.3%)
0
2
+1.4%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 2 of 3 within 5.0% · 1 of 3 more than 5.0% aboveEach bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.
Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way.
Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.
Statements that are not predictions: 40 opinions and 40 not about a match.
How this return was calculated
Every settled pick in “Recorded before kick-off, at our recorded market price” is a stake of 100 points at our recorded market price, a pre-match snapshot of the same selection. The net result (−72 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 2 settled live picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (200 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.
Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.
Separate comparison window — last 90 days: −72 points on 2 live picks settled in this window · 2 matches · (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted
Changes to this record
Earlier figures stay here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.
New results ·
Before
no published headline number
After
−72.00 points on 2 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
First headline number for this record: 2 settled picks in the series “independent odds snapshot”.
Who this is
Last recorded by us
, 1 day before this page's data date
Observed
—
Channels
website
Statements other than predictions (48 shown)
“El escenario futbolístico apunta a un triunfo del local por una diferencia superior a un gol.” — · source
“Se proyecta un compromiso con claro monólogo de Universitario frente a un rival que suele” — · source
“La necesidad de meterse en la foto final del campeonato llevará a Alianza Lima a volcar la cancha” — · source
“¿Quién ganará Sport Boys vs UTC Cajamarca? Sport Boys cuenta con el favoritismo para quedarse con el triunfo por localía” — · source
“¿Quién ganará Deportivo Garcilaso vs Comerciantes Unidos? Deportivo Garcilaso ostenta la ventaja teórica” — · source
“La presión por no cometer errores en la pugna por el título forzará bloques cerrados y pocas” — · source
“Considerando la necesidad arequipeña de no tropezar en casa y la recurrencia de ambos elencos” — · source
“Se proyecta un choque intenso con Melgar asumiendo el protagonismo y el asedio territorial” — · source
“La altitud de Tarma y la solidez local inclinan levemente las cuotas hacia ADT, pero la jerarquía” — · source
“Se espera un partido de poca fluidez, con dos equipos urgidos y pocas ideas en ataque.” — · source
“lo más probable es que Alianza Lima no gane sin recibir gol.” — · source
“Se espera un partido sin pausas, con un local que insiste hasta el final y un visitante que ya sabe” — · source
“Con cuotas parejas, un local que defiende en altura y un visitante que viaja desde el Cusco, es probable” — · source
“La apuesta recomendada es Total de goles en el primer tiempo: Menos de 1.5, a cuota 1.46.” — · source
“Se proyecta un partido de arranque cauteloso, con un local ordenado y un visitante que debe cuidarse.” — · source
“Se proyecta un partido en el que Cristal domine y aproveche las fallas defensivas de un rival” — · source
“Se anticipa un partido abierto por la desesperación del local” — · source
“¿Quién ganará Cusco FC vs Sport Boys? Cusco FC es el principal favorito por la altitud” — · source
“Se espera un partido con un claro favorito, con el visitante manejando la pelota” — · source
“Se proyecta un partido abierto, con un local que suele marcar temprano y un visitante que suele” — · source
Cuotas FBC Melgar vs Juan Pablo II – ¿Cuánto paga?
Estas son las cuotas 1×2 disponibles en Betano
Con un local necesitado de recuperar terreno tras dos derrotas, un visitante con la defensa frágil y una cuota de 1.50 para su victoria, lo más lógico es que Garcilaso abra el marcador.