Forecast Record recorded 6 settled live picks by Carlo Tagliagambe before kick-off across 6 matches between 11 October and . Won 4 of 6 settled live picks at our recorded market prices.
Tracking level: Probation — day 23 of 30 needed for Tracked · 10 predictions checked against the final score
How tracking levels work
Tracked requires 30 predictions checked against the final score over 30 days in at least 2 weeks. Established requires 100 predictions checked against the final score with at least 90 days of history. Tracking-level rules
Record summary
4 won / 2 lost; average odds 1.91
Small sample (6) · 6 settled picks · picks settled under method v2.2
Eligible prices were available for 6 of the 10 selections checked against the result.
Forecast Record recorded 6 settled live picks by Carlo Tagliagambe before kick-off across 6 matches between 11 October and 2 November 2026. Won 4 of 6 settled live picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 18 predictions we hold for Carlo Tagliagambe, 12 are linked to matches: 10 were recorded by us before kick-off and 2 first found after kick-off. Figures as of 7 November 2026.
Previously published citation
Forecast Record recorded 6 settled live picks by Carlo Tagliagambe before kick-off across 6 matches between 11 October and 2 November 2026. Won 4 of 6 settled live picks at our recorded market prices. Of the 18 predictions we hold for Carlo Tagliagambe, 12 are linked to matches: 10 were recorded by us before kick-off and 2 first found after the match. Figures as of .
Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.51.90 market priceRecorded 10 h before kick-offWon
puntiamo sull'Over 2,5 . La fiducia è media, supportata da una probabilità stimata del 57,1% che riflette l'alto volume di gioco creato dai rossoneri tra le mura amiche.
Player to score: Daniel Maldini to score4.00Recorded 30.8 h before kick-offExcluded from the return
il nome caldo per il Cagliari è sempre quello di Daniel Maldini, a segno in quattro delle ultime cinque partite: la quota a 4.00 rende una sua marcatura un'opzione da non sottovalutare secondo l'intelligenza artificiale.
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the returnun suo tentativo anche contro i rossoneri paga tra 1.80 e 1.82.gazzetta.it
Statement: Statementwithout a stated priceFound after kick-off (published , recorded )Excluded from the returnCOMPARAZIONE QUOTE MILAN-ATALANTA: RABIOT OVER 0,5 TIRI IN PORTA
1.98gazzetta.it
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the return
La probabilità che si ripeta anche nel derby è stimata dall'IA al 65.41%: un dato che, incrociato con la quota a 1.95, genera un valore positivo del 65.41%, il più alto in assoluto per il match.gazzetta.it
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the return
la possibilità di un Over 1.5 falli è stimata al 60.53% dagli operatori, un dato che - incrociato con la quota a 2 - genera un expected value del 21.06%, il più alto del match.gazzetta.it
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the return
La nostra intelligenza artificiale segnala poi una quota interessante su Kike Perez, che nelle ultime quattro partite ha sempre commesso almeno due falli.gazzetta.it
Statement without a matchwithout a stated priceExcluded from the return
La previsione del software per la gara contro il Frosinone è di 0.7 tiri in porta: per questo la quota tra 1.80 e 1.85 è considerata una delle giocate più interessanti di giornata.gazzetta.it
Carlo Tagliagambe on Forecast Record: 10 pre-match predictions recorded (11 October–2 November 2026). Full log: https://forecastrecord.com/authors/carlo-tagliagambe/
Archive of the previous page layout (kept for the record)
Last change · Price rule: independent odds snapshot · Sample: 6 settled live picks, 6 matches · View changes to this record
Data changes. 1 record shown here has been corrected; the last correction was on , with its reason in the corrections log. Corrections log. Added later: 2 records added on Found after kick-off. The current numbers include them; numbers published earlier, including the record before each match, do not change.
To link to this record from your site or bio, copy the line below. It states only the facts of this record.
<a href="https://forecastrecord.com/authors/carlo-tagliagambe/">Record tracked by Forecast Record since 11 October 2026 · 18 predictions · last change 1 November 2026</a>
Recorded before kick-off: supporting evidence
Eligible price: a market price that meets the price rule of its part of the record; the return is calculated on picks with one. Definition.
4 predictions recorded before kick-off. Right in 1 of 3.
Prices implied by market
By market: Over/under goals 3 of 5 (3 W / 2 L, average odds 1.96) Small sample (5); Both teams to score 1 of 1 (1 W / 0 L, average odds 1.67) Small sample (1).
The implied share is the average of 1 ÷ price; it includes the bookmaker margin, so it is slightly above a fair chance. Markets with low prices are won more often, so a share of picks won says little on its own.
Other prices on the same picks: each row compares two prices on exactly the same selections
Price
Same picks
Period
At that price
Return at our recorded market price
Author-quoted price
3
11 October –
+32 points
+29.12 points
Closing price
6
11 October –
+114.94 points
+121.71 points
An author-quoted price is the price the article offered; the headline return uses the market price in the last column.
Found after kick-off
First Found after kick-off; the date is the one the source states.
2 predictions; 0 checked against the final score.
What kind of number is this?
Measured
Settled by us from the final score. Supporting evidence: Directly observed in a source or timestamped capture. Here: the moment we first captured each prediction; our pre-match market snapshot of each settled pick.
Stated
The author’s own claim, shown as published. Reported by the source; not independently confirmed. Here: the publication date a source page shows; the price an author quoted.
Calculated
Derived from the listed inputs under a published rule. Here: outcomes against the final score; returns, intervals and the share of picks won.
Unknown
Not established from the evidence available. Here: the market price at the moment a restored pick was published.
How the prices this author stated compare with an independent market price of the same selection. Calculated from the picks where both prices are known; a gap can come from market movement or from one bookmaker offering more than the market, so it describes the stated prices, not the reason for them.
Stated price against the market, threshold 5.0%
Compared with
Picks
>5.0% above
>5.0% below
Within
Median
Our market price when we first recorded the pick
3
0 (0.0%)
0
3
0.0%
Stated price against the market · For each basis of comparison, the share of picks whose stated price was more than 5.0% below the market, within 5.0%, or more than 5.0% above. · more than 5.0% below · within 5.0% · more than 5.0% above · Our market price when we first recorded the pick · 3 of 3 within 5.0%Each bar is 100.0% of the picks compared on that basis; numbers are picks. The table above gives the same counts and the median difference.
Our market price when we first recorded the pick — our market price for the same selection when we first recorded the pick (median of bookmakers in our price feed; failing that, the first price within 2 hours after, always before kick-off). Difference = the author's stated price ÷ the market price of the same selection − 1. A pick counts as above the market when the stated price is more than 5.0% higher. Each basis is its own comparison; they are never added together. A pair whose prices differ more than twofold is marked “price disputed”: it is probably not the same selection, so it is left out of this comparison and of every return at the author’s price until a manual check confirms the price. A price that the quoted text does not give is marked “price disputed” in the same way.
Author's response
No author's response is published on this page. Responses are published word for word. Correction requests are checked, and every change is logged.
Here a pick counts as settled when it has a result at any recorded price; the numbers at the top use only the price rule of their own part of the record.
Statements that are not predictions: 9 opinions and 32 not about a match.
How this return was calculated
Every settled pick in “Recorded before kick-off, at our recorded market price” is a stake of 100 points at our recorded market price, a pre-match snapshot of the same selection. The net result (+121.71 points) is the sum of the profit and loss of these 6 settled live picks; the return is the net result divided by the total staked (600 points), void picks excluded. Definition of return on stakes · How a pick is settled.
Other prices of the same picks are compared row by row in each part of the record above; they are never added to this number.
Separate comparison window — last 90 days: +121.71 points on 6 live picks settled in this window · 6 matches · 11 October – (calculated, method v2.2). How comparison windows are counted
Changes to this record
Earlier figures stay here with the reason: new results, extended coverage, a correction or a method change. Corrections are also listed in the corrections log.
Coverage extended ·
Before
+57.21 points on 3 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
+121.71 points on 6 settled picks across 6 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 3 earlier picks for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
Coverage extended ·
Before
−32.88 points on 2 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
+57.21 points on 3 settled picks across 3 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
Added 1 earlier pick for matches played before the previous record update (found in archives or newly matched to a fixture).
New results ·
Before
+67.12 points on 1 settled pick across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
After
−32.88 points on 2 settled picks across 2 matches · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
1 new settled pick from matches played after the previous record update.
New results ·
Before
no published headline number
After
+67.12 points on 1 settled pick across 1 match · independent odds snapshot · method 2.2
First headline number for this record: 1 settled pick in the series “independent odds snapshot”.
Who this is
Last recorded by us
, 2 days before this page's data date
Observed
—
Channels
website
Statements other than predictions (41 shown)
“Secondo i bookie il grande favorito sarebbe Stefano Pioli, fermo dopo la disastrosa esperienza contro la Fiorentina” — · source
“optare per un esonero a pochi giorni dalla sosta rischierebbe di essere controproducente” — · source
“Se Juve-Napoli doveva essere decisiva per Spalletti o per Allegri, a Max è andata decisamente peggio.” — · source
“Sarri e Gilardino giocano con lo stesso obiettivo: lasciarsi la crisi alle spalle” — · source
“Anche per questo la quota del mercato 'Genoa segna per primo' tra 1.85 (Stake e Bwin) e 1.90 (StarVegas e Pokerstars) appare come una delle più interessanti” — · source
“anche la qualificazione in Champions sembra una chimera” — · source
“i tifosi bianconeri sognano il suo ritorno, frustrati dall'inizio di campionato difficile sotto la gestione Spalletti.” — · source
“il Milan parte favorito sulle lavagne dei bookmaker” — · source
“il Diavolo è considerata la destinazione italiana più probabile, con quote a 6.” — · source
Gazzetta AI Predictor confronta le quote, analizza le statistiche e studia i mercati migliori mostrandoti i più
Nel caso la crisi del Napoli dovesse portare all'esonero, per la panchina azzurra si profila un vero e proprio casting con un poker di nomi decisamente interessante.
la rete di entrambe le squadre è in lavagna a 1.70 ed è ritenuta più probabile rispetto al No Gol, che invece sfonda il raddoppio e si attesta sul 2.14.
Rossoneri favoriti sulle lavagne dei principali siti di scommesse, dove il segno 2 paga fino a 1.84 contro il 3.85 del pareggio e il 4.50 toccato dal successo del Sassuolo