Transfermarkt.es: football prediction record
Transfermarkt.es — Pronósticos deportivos — football predictions, page 116 of 133
Page 116 of 133 of the predictions by Transfermarkt.es — Pronósticos deportivos recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 2,281–2,300 of 2,623 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 116 of 133
Showing 2281–2300 of 2,623 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 2,623 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
12 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- AZ Alkmaar v Juventus Excluded
Said: Over/Under 1.5 goals: over 1.5 · final score 1-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Goles totales Más 1,5
- Author said
- Over/Under 1.5 goals: over 1.5
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was AZ Alkmaar 1-2 Juventus.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- AZ Alkmaar — Juventus, , final score 1-2
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Goles totales Bajo 5,5 Se han marcado menos de 5,5 goles en 5 de los últimos 5 partidos del SL Benfica. Se han marcado menos de 5,5 goles en 4 de los últimos 5 partidos del Lech Poznań.”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “La apuesta principal es victoria de SL Benfica (1X2)”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “como opción adicional, recomendamos ambos equipos no anotan”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Handicap 0:2 Victoria visitante El SL Benfica no ha ganado por 2 o más goles 2 de sus últimos 5 partidos. El Lech Poznań no ha perdido por 2 o más goles 5 de sus últimos 5 partidos.”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Goles totales Bajo 3,5 Se han marcado menos de 3,5 goles en 2 de los últimos 5 partidos del SL Benfica. Se han marcado menos de 3,5 goles en 3 de los últimos 5 partidos del Lech Poznań.”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Doble oportunidad X2”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Celta Vigo v Union St. Gilloise Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.6 · final score 1-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
El segundo consejo es ambos equipos anotan: Sí, a 1.60 en 888sport.
- Author said
- Both teams to score: yes at 1.6
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Celta Vigo 1-2 Union St. Gilloise.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Celta Vigo — Union St. Gilloise, , final score 1-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.60 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Celta Vigo v Union St. Gilloise Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Celta Vigo at 2.2 · final score 1-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Nuestra primera recomendación es la victoria local, mercado 1X2, a cuota 2.20 en Versus.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Celta Vigo at 2.2
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Celta Vigo 1-2 Union St. Gilloise.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Celta Vigo — Union St. Gilloise, , final score 1-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 2.20 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “con ambos equipos anotan: Sí como segunda apuesta”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “el pronóstico principal es la victoria del Celta en el mercado 1X2”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Goles totales Bajo 3,5”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Goles totales Más 2,5”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Nuestro consejo principal es Beşiktaş gana, por su mejor trayectoria europea, su posición en la tabla y su invicto en tres jornadas.”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “El segundo consejo es ambos equipos marcan: sí, con la cautela de que el Celtic ha tenido problemas para encontrar el gol.”
2 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Sunderland v Dinamo Zagreb Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: Sunderland at 1.48 · final score 0-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
La localía y el invicto europeo hacen razonable respaldar al conjunto inglés, aunque conviene mantener una previsión moderada: la cuota de 1.48 refleja favoritismo, no una victoria segura.
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Sunderland at 1.48
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo Zagreb.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Sunderland — Dinamo Zagreb, , final score 0-2
- Prices for this pick
- author's price 1.48 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
- Sunderland v Dinamo Zagreb Excluded
Said: Double chance: draw or Dinamo Zagreb · final score 0-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Doble oportunidad X2 El Sunderland AFC ha empatado o perdido 4 de sus últimos 5 partidos. El Dinamo Zagreb ha ganado o empatado 3 de sus últimos 5 partidos.
- Author said
- Double chance: draw or Dinamo Zagreb
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo Zagreb.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Sunderland — Dinamo Zagreb, , final score 0-2
- Sunderland v Dinamo Zagreb Excluded
Said: Double chance: Sunderland or Dinamo Zagreb · final score 0-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Doble oportunidad 12 El Sunderland AFC ha ganado o perdido 3 de sus últimos 5 partidos. El Dinamo Zagreb ha ganado o perdido 5 de sus últimos 5 partidos.
- Author said
- Double chance: Sunderland or Dinamo Zagreb
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo Zagreb.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Sunderland — Dinamo Zagreb, , final score 0-2
- Sunderland v Dinamo Zagreb Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes · final score 0-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
ambos equipos anotan: sí ofrece una alternativa coherente con los goles recientes y con la capacidad ofensiva de los dos equipos
- Author said
- Both teams to score: yes
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo Zagreb.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Sunderland — Dinamo Zagreb, , final score 0-2
- Sunderland v Dinamo Zagreb Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 · final score 0-2
5 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Goles totales Bajo 2,5 Se han marcado menos de 2,5 goles en 3 de los últimos 5 partidos del Sunderland AFC. Se han marcado menos de 2,5 goles en 2 de los últimos 5 partidos del Dinamo Zagreb.
- Author said
- Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5
- Outcome of the pick
- Won: the final score was Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo Zagreb.
- Source
- transfermarkt.es (website)
- Attribution
- unknown
- Origin
- Recorded by us before kick-off
- Published
- (the source page's date)
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- ambiguous
- Event
- Sunderland — Dinamo Zagreb, , final score 0-2
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us