Melissa Samaroo: football prediction record
Melissa Samaroo — football predictions, page 2 of 7
Page 2 of 7 of the predictions by Melissa Samaroo recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 1–20 of 112 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 2 of 7
Showing 1–20 of 112 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 112 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
2 rows on this page have no evidence card: they were found after the match or restored from archive copies, and their outcome and price are shown in the row itself.
16 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Broncos moneyline: +115”
25 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Our final score prediction: Broncos 23, Rams 20.”
25 September 2026 · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “we’re backing the reigning World and European champions to get the job done”
24 September 2026 · national-team match (Nations League, qualifiers, continental cups) · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “That number is small enough to make Denver +2.5 the cleaner opening position”
11 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “expecting a relatively controlled contest, with the Under 3.5 [...]”
11 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “prediction leans toward a draw”
11 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Pick: Saskatchewan Roughriders -1.5”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Prediction: Argonauts 35, Redblacks 20.”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Stampeders +3.5 spread -110”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Prediction: Roughriders 30, Blue Bombers 27.”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Prediction: Elks 30, Stampeders 28.”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Pick: Montreal Alouettes -1.5”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Argonauts -10.5 spread -110”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Prediction: Alouettes 33, Lions 30.”
10 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Liverpool v Fulham Lost
Said: 1X2, match result: Liverpool · final score 0-0
12 September 2026 · settled at the last pre-match archive price 1.50, restored: −100 points · Found after the match; date as stated by the source
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
backing the Reds to continue their strong start at Anfield and secure all three points
- Author said
- 1X2, match result: Liverpool
- Outcome of the pick
- Lost: the final score was Liverpool 0-0 Fulham.
- Source
- canadasportsbetting.ca (RSS)
- Speaker
- Melissa Samaroo
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Found after the match; date as stated by the source
- Published
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated pick without a price
- State
- seen too late
- Event
- Liverpool v Fulham, , final score 0-0
- Prices for this pick
- author's price — · independent odds snapshot — · closing 1.49
- Count status
- counted in the restored-history series
Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake Series Market and pick Price Stake Result Points Method Restored, at the closing market price 1X2, match result — Liverpool 1.49 100.00 Lost −100.00 retro-1.0 Restored, at the last pre-match price in archive (~8–15 h before kick-off) 1X2, match result — Liverpool 1.50 100.00 Lost −100.00 retro-1.1 - No match linked Excluded
Said: “Bonus Tip: Barcelona to Win Both Halves & Over 2.5 Goals (+183)”
8 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Arozarena to hit a home run +500”
25 August 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Tatis Jr. to hit a home run +470”
25 August 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Perez to hit a home run +430”
25 August 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- No match linked Excluded
Said: “Cameron Schlittler under 1.5 earned runs: -140 (BET99)”
29 September 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement · Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and
Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
Cameron Schlittler under 1.5 earned runs: -140 (BET99)
- Source
- canadasportsbetting.ca (RSS)
- Speaker
- Melissa Samaroo
- Attribution
- channel owner
- Origin
- Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement
- Correction
- Corrected on : Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and
- Published
- First recorded by us
- Class
- stated price and stake
- State
- not supported
Corrected . The line was “Player shots on target over/under −1.5 · under −1.5 shots on target”; it is now “Player shots on target over/under 1.5 · under 1.5 shots on target”. Data corrected: line sign. The line of this over/under market was recorded with a minus sign; a total cannot be negative, and the source gives the line without one. The line now matches the source and the outcome is worked out on it. This pick was never executed, so no number changes. Corrections log
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us