Forecast Record Tips today

Jasper van den Boogaard: football prediction record

Jasper van den Boogaard — football predictions, page 52 of 81

Page 52 of 81 of the predictions by Jasper van den Boogaard recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 1,001–1,020 of 1,592 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 52 of 81

Showing 1001–1020 of 1,592 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 1,592 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

16 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page · Current predictions.

  1. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: Real Madrid - Meer dan 3.5 reddingen @ 2.50.”

    30 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  2. Said: Correct score: Real Racing Club 0-3 Real Madrid · final score 0-3

    1 November 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Eindvoorspelling: 0-3 – Real Madrid wint comfortabel in Santander.
    Author said
    Correct score: Real Racing Club 0-3 Real Madrid
    Outcome of the pick
    Matched: the final score was Real Racing Club 0-3 Real Madrid.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Real Racing Club — Real Madrid, , final score 0-3
  3. Said: Correct score: Colorado Rapids 1-1 Chicago Fire · final score 2-4

    1 November 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Colorado Rapids 1 - 1 FT Chicago Fire
    Author said
    Correct score: Colorado Rapids 1-1 Chicago Fire
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Colorado Rapids 2-4 Chicago Fire.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Colorado Rapids — Chicago Fire, , final score 2-4
  4. Said: 1X2, match result: draw · final score 2-4

    1 November 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    De onderlinge historie wijst op een evenwichtig duel, en de rekenmodellen geven Chicago een lichte voorkeur met 52,7 procent winstkans. Toch past een gelijkspel het beste bij het beeld van beide ploegen.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: draw
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Colorado Rapids 2-4 Chicago Fire.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated pick without a price
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Colorado Rapids — Chicago Fire, , final score 2-4
  5. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: meer dan 6.5 reddingen @ 1.87.”

    29 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  6. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: meer dan 28.5 schoten @ 1.93.”

    30 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  7. Said: Correct score: Excelsior 0-2 FC Twente · final score 0-9

    1 November 2026 · Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Verwachte uitslag Eredivisie Excelsior 0 - 2 FT FC Twente
    Author said
    Correct score: Excelsior 0-2 FC Twente
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Excelsior 0-9 FC Twente.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us after kick-off; date as stated by the source
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    Excelsior — FC Twente, , final score 0-9
  8. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Boston Celtics -4,5 bij Orlando Magic (1,56)”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  9. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Indiana Pacers wint Winnaar, incl. verlenging 1,63”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  10. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “De tip: meer dan 224,5 punten, odd 1,73.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  11. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Indiana Pacers wint van Brooklyn Nets (1,63)”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  12. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “meer dan 224,5 punten in Los Angeles Lakers – Toronto Raptors (1,73)”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  13. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Meer dan 6,5 goals staat op 1,87.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  14. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Liever meer? Carolina -1,5 staat op 1,87.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  15. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “De tip: Utah Mammoth wint, odd 1,61.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  16. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Onze voorspelling: Carolina Hurricanes – Winnipeg Jets 4-1.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  17. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Wil je een hogere odd? Utah -1,5 staat op 2,35.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  18. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “De tip: Carolina Hurricanes wint in de reguliere speeltijd, odd 1,54.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  19. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “De odd van 1,54 gaat uit van 65%, wij schatten de kans op 70%. Het risico: Carolina won zijn laatste twee thuiswedstrijden met maar één goal verschil, en dan ligt een verlenging op de loer. Wil je…”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  20. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “De tip: Utah Mammoth wint, odd 1,61. Markt: Winnaar, inclusief verlenging en shoot-out.”

    1 November 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us