Forecast Record Tips today

Jasper van den Boogaard: football prediction record

Jasper van den Boogaard — football predictions, page 35 of 81

Page 35 of 81 of the predictions by Jasper van den Boogaard recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 661–680 of 1,592 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.

Source: our own evidence archive

Recorded picks and results, page 35 of 81

Showing 661–680 of 1,592 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 1,592 (JSON).

Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.

8 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.

Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page · Current predictions.

  1. Said: Over/Under 1.5 goals: under 1.5 at 1.56 · final score 2-0

    28 October 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Recorded before kick-off: saved by us from the source before the match started, with the time we saved it. Definition.

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Beste wedtip: Dynamo Dresden - Minder dan 1.5 doelpunten @ 1.56.
    Author said
    Over/Under 1.5 goals: under 1.5 at 1.56
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Dynamo Dresden 2-0 FC Schalke 04.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    recognised
    Event
    Dynamo Dresden — FC Schalke 04, , final score 2-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.56 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  2. Said: Correct score: Dynamo Dresden 1-2 FC Schalke 04 · final score 2-0

    28 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Dynamo Dresden Schalke 04 Verwachte uitslag DFB-Pokal Dynamo Dresden 1 - 2
    Author said
    Correct score: Dynamo Dresden 1-2 FC Schalke 04
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Dynamo Dresden 2-0 FC Schalke 04.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    Dynamo Dresden — FC Schalke 04, , final score 2-0
  3. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: Udinese of gelijkspel & Meer dan 1.5 doelpunten @ 2.00.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  4. Said: Correct score: Parma 1-2 Udinese · final score 0-0

    28 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Parma 1 - 2 FT Udinese
    Author said
    Correct score: Parma 1-2 Udinese
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Parma 0-0 Udinese.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    Parma — Udinese, , final score 0-0
  5. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: Genoa - Meer dan 9.5 schoten @ 1.75.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  6. Said: 1X2, match result: Juventus · final score 2-0

    28 October 2026 · settled at our market price 1.67: −100 points · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Een Juventus-overwinning ligt het meest voor de hand.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: Juventus
    Outcome of the pick
    Lost: the final score was Genoa 2-0 Juventus.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated pick without a price
    State
    recognised
    Event
    Genoa — Juventus, , final score 2-0
    Prices for this pick
    author's price — · independent odds snapshot 1.67 · closing — (snapshot taken ; from a commercial odds aggregator; closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    At an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — Juventus1.67100.00Lost−100.00v2.2
  7. Said: Correct score: Genoa 0-2 Juventus · final score 2-0

    28 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Verwachte uitslag Serie A Genoa 0 - 2 FT Juventus
    Author said
    Correct score: Genoa 0-2 Juventus
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was Genoa 2-0 Juventus.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    Genoa — Juventus, , final score 2-0
  8. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Celtic 3 - 0 FT Dundee United”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  9. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: minder dan 3.5 doelpunten @ 1.98.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  10. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “👉 Eindvoorspelling: 0-3 – Heerenveen wint comfortabel en plaatst zich voor de volgende ronde.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  11. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: Heerenveen wint en houdt de nul @ 2.15.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  12. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “👉 Eindvoorspelling: 0-3 – Heerenveen wint comfortabel en plaatst zich voor de volgende ronde.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  13. Said: 1X2, match result: FC Bayern München · final score 6-1

    28 October 2026 · settled at our market price 1.04: +4 points · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Conclusie: Bayern heeft alle reden om dit serieus te nemen en het niveauverschil is te groot voor een echte stuntavond.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: FC Bayern München
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was FC Bayern München 6-1 Magdeburg.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated pick without a price
    State
    recognised
    Event
    FC Bayern München — Magdeburg, , final score 6-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price — · independent odds snapshot 1.04 · closing — (snapshot taken ; from a commercial odds aggregator; closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    At an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — FC Bayern München1.04100.00Won4.00v2.2
  14. Said: Player to score: Michael Olise to score at 1.91 · final score 6-1

    28 October 2026 · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Beste wedtip: Olise scoort @ 1.91.
    Author said
    Player to score: Michael Olise to score at 1.91
    Outcome of the pick
    Pending: the result data received so far does not include the player statistics this market needs.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    recognised
    Event
    FC Bayern München — Magdeburg, , final score 6-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.91 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  15. Said: Correct score: FC Bayern München 4-0 Magdeburg · final score 6-1

    28 October 2026 · score forecast without a price, graded against the final score · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Eindvoorspelling: 4-0 – Bayern München wint comfortabel en plaatst zich zonder moeite voor de volgende ronde van de DFB Pokal.
    Author said
    Correct score: FC Bayern München 4-0 Magdeburg
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was FC Bayern München 6-1 Magdeburg.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    FC Bayern München — Magdeburg, , final score 6-1
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    Forecast Record reconstruction from the predicted score1X2, match result — FC Bayern München1.04100.00Won4.00v2.2
  16. Said: Correct score: SC Paderborn 07 0-2 VfB Stuttgart · final score 0-1

    28 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Eindvoorspelling: 0-2 – Stuttgart wint opnieuw in Paderborn en plaatst zich voor de volgende ronde van de DFB Pokal.
    Author said
    Correct score: SC Paderborn 07 0-2 VfB Stuttgart
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was SC Paderborn 07 0-1 VfB Stuttgart.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    SC Paderborn 07 — VfB Stuttgart, , final score 0-1
  17. Said: 1X2, match result: VfB Stuttgart · final score 0-1

    28 October 2026 · settled at our market price 1.54: +54 points · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Trend: Stuttgart wint dit duel consequent en heeft Paderborn nog nooit laten winnen in vier onderlinge ontmoetingen.
    Author said
    1X2, match result: VfB Stuttgart
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was SC Paderborn 07 0-1 VfB Stuttgart.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated pick without a price
    State
    recognised
    Event
    SC Paderborn 07 — VfB Stuttgart, , final score 0-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price — · independent odds snapshot 1.54 · closing — (snapshot taken ; from a commercial odds aggregator; closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
    Calculations by series: Forecast Record reconstruction, 1 point = 1 unit of stake
    SeriesMarket and pickPriceStakeResultPointsMethod
    At an independent odds snapshot1X2, match result — VfB Stuttgart1.54100.00Won54.00v2.2
  18. Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.56 · final score 0-1

    28 October 2026 · graded against the result: right · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    Beste wedtip: VfB Stuttgart - Minder dan 2.5 doelpunten @ 1.56.
    Author said
    Over/Under 2.5 goals: under 2.5 at 1.56
    Outcome of the pick
    Won: the final score was SC Paderborn 07 0-1 VfB Stuttgart.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    stated price and stake
    State
    ambiguous
    Event
    SC Paderborn 07 — VfB Stuttgart, , final score 0-1
    Prices for this pick
    author's price 1.56 · independent odds snapshot — · closing — (closing price unknown (not reconstructed))
  19. No match linked Excluded

    Said: “Beste wedtip: meer dan 26.5 schoten @ 1.91.”

    26 October 2026 · Date as stated by the source; no match is linked to this statement

  20. Said: Correct score: AFC Bournemouth 1-2 Aston Villa · final score 3-0

    28 October 2026 · graded against the result: wrong · Recorded by us before kick-off

    Evidence: source, timestamps, prices and calculation
    👉 Eindvoorspelling: 1-2 – Aston Villa wint een spannende League Cup-wedstrijd op vreemde bodem.
    Author said
    Correct score: AFC Bournemouth 1-2 Aston Villa
    Outcome of the pick
    Did not match: the final score was AFC Bournemouth 3-0 Aston Villa.
    Source
    bet-experts.nl (website)
    Speaker
    Jasper van den Boogaard
    Attribution
    channel owner
    Origin
    Recorded by us before kick-off
    Published
    (the source page's date)
    First recorded by us
    Class
    score forecast
    State
    recognised
    Event
    AFC Bournemouth — Aston Villa, , final score 3-0

The same data, machine-readable

From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.

Check us