Ivan Erofeev: football prediction record
Ivan Erofeev — football predictions, page 29 of 44
Page 29 of 44 of the predictions by Ivan Erofeev recorded by Forecast Record: predictions 541–560 of 857 in the order we recorded them, earliest first; as of . Each row links to its evidence, and the summary of the record is on the profile page.
Source: our own evidence archive
Recorded picks and results, page 29 of 44
Showing 541–560 of 857 predictions: settled first, then pending, then excluded; most recent matches first within each. Download all 857 (JSON).
Settled: the outcome is checked against the final score and the pick is priced under the published rule; a void pick returns the stake. Definition.
20 rows on this page are set aside; the reason is shown in each row.
Filter the 20 predictions shown on this page.
- 1. FC Union Berlin v SV Werder Bremen Excluded
Said: Correct score: 1. FC Union Berlin 2-1 SV Werder Bremen · final score 1-4
8 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
Source-reported: dated by the source's own published history, without an independent archive copy from before kick-off. Definition.
- 1. FC Union Berlin v SV Werder Bremen Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: 1. FC Union Berlin at 2.3 · final score 1-4
8 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- FC St. Pauli v Eintracht Frankfurt Excluded
Said: Correct score: FC St. Pauli 1-2 Eintracht Frankfurt · final score 0-0
8 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- FC St. Pauli v Eintracht Frankfurt Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.8 · final score 0-0
8 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Athletic Club v FC Barcelona Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: FC Barcelona at 1.75 · final score 0-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Athletic Club v FC Barcelona Excluded
Said: Correct score: Athletic Club 1-3 FC Barcelona · final score 0-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Atlético Madrid v Real Sociedad Excluded
Said: Correct score: Atlético Madrid 2-1 Real Sociedad · final score 3-2
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Atlético Madrid v Real Sociedad Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.8 · final score 3-2
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Atlético Madrid v Real Sociedad Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 2.2 · final score 3-2
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · price disputed: the quote does not give the author's price 2.20; returns at the author's price leave it out · Source-reported history
- Levante UD v Girona Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.75 · final score 1-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Levante UD v Girona Excluded
Said: Correct score: Levante UD 2-2 Girona · final score 1-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- Levante UD v Girona Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 2.0 · final score 1-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- 1. FC Heidenheim v TSG Hoffenheim Excluded
Said: Correct score: 1. FC Heidenheim 1-3 TSG Hoffenheim · final score 2-4
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- 1. FC Heidenheim v TSG Hoffenheim Excluded
Said: 1X2, match result: TSG Hoffenheim at 1.7 · final score 2-4
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- SC Freiburg v Bayer 04 Leverkusen Excluded
Said: Correct score: SC Freiburg 2-1 Bayer 04 Leverkusen · final score 3-3
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- RB Leipzig v FC Augsburg Excluded
Said: Both teams to score: yes at 1.7 · final score 2-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- RB Leipzig v FC Augsburg Excluded
Said: Correct score: RB Leipzig 2-1 FC Augsburg · final score 2-1
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- 1. FSV Mainz 05 v VfB Stuttgart Excluded
Said: Over/Under 2.5 goals: over 2.5 at 1.7 · final score 2-2
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- 1. FSV Mainz 05 v VfB Stuttgart Excluded
Said: Correct score: 1. FSV Mainz 05 1-2 VfB Stuttgart · final score 2-2
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
- VfL Wolfsburg v Hamburger SV Excluded
Said: Double chance: draw or Hamburger SV at 1.7
7 March 2026 · the article byline and the named tipster differ; this selection is kept out of individual totals · Source-reported history
The same data, machine-readable
From the same snapshot as this page: the same numbers, series and dates. A download can list more records than the page shows; each file states its own counts.
Check us